Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99
News Opinion Readers Respond

Maryland's energy future requires investment now

While I agree with Jay Hancock ("A bright energy future lighted by small changes," April 17) that conservation and the use of natural gas and LEDs is part of the solution to our energy needs — as well as the global warming problem — it is simply not enough.

The use of cleaner coal plants or so-called "clean coal, and fracking to obtain coal" as well as proposed nuclear plants, proposes environmental and health risks that are not acceptable. In fact we either pay now, or pay more later.

Wind power is a no-brainer, as is requiring all new homes to be built with tankless water heaters, all new large flat roofed buildings to be green and creating green roofs on government buildings —especially schools — wherever feasible.

While I realize that not everyone is able to pay the additional dollars on their utility bills needed to pay for wind turbines, many people would be willing to make the sacrifice. Perhaps a donation on the Maryland income tax forms right next to the Chesapeake Bay fund, would produce some of the capital needed.

Linda K. Brown, Baltimore

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Md. should ban fracking
    Md. should ban fracking

    Thank you for bringing attention to New York's recent ban on fracking ("Fracking ban in NY prompts calls for MD to follow suit," Dec. 17). I applaud Gov. Andrew Cuomo for putting the health of New Yorkers above the pressure for dirty energy. Now it's time for Maryland to do the same.

  • Fracking's risks are 'considerable'
    Fracking's risks are 'considerable'

    I applaud your March 23 editorial endorsing a moratorium on fracking in Western Maryland ("Fracking deserves a pause," March 25). My considerable research reveals fracking in Maryland imposes severe and permanent environmental risks with questionable to negative long-term economic impacts to...

  • Fracking moratorium is the right step
    Fracking moratorium is the right step

    Your editorial ("Fracking deserves a pause," March 25) got it right on all counts. Fracking simply does not mesh well with our tourist industry in Western Maryland.

  • Fracking not worth the risks
    Fracking not worth the risks

    I applaud The Baltimore Sun for its position in favor of a moratorium on fracking in Maryland ("Fracking deserves a pause," March 25). We are learning more every day of the irreparable damage being done to the environment and health of people living where hydraulic fracturing is taking place....

  • Fracking deserves a pause
    Fracking deserves a pause

    The Maryland House of Delegates gave final approval Tuesday to legislation that would place a moratorium on the use of hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking," to produce natural gas in this state for the next three years. The vote was 93-to-45, a two-thirds majority. The proposal offers the kind...

  • Stop fracking in Md. before your water starts tasting like licorice
    Stop fracking in Md. before your water starts tasting like licorice

    Maryland residents must support the moratorium on fracking and the "gold standard regulations" ("Health, environmental groups seek fracking moratorium," Feb. 5).

  • Why ruin Garrett County?
    Why ruin Garrett County?

    As a retired couple, one of many living in Garrett County, my wife and I find the possibility of fracking wells and all that comes with them completely distressing ("The risks of fracking outweigh the potential benefits," March 3). Having come from a metropolitan area industrialized to the...

  • Fracking poses problems for Western Md.
    Fracking poses problems for Western Md.

    Last week, a Garrett County resident testified in Annapolis that Maryland should proceed with fracking, the dangerous industrial practice recently banned in New York. He claimed that Western Maryland needs the jobs. I ask, what jobs?

Comments
Loading