Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Time to abolish Electoral College

A recent Baltimore Sun article, "Election remake hits hurdles," (Jan. 29) brings to light new thoughts on how to change the rules of the Electoral College. At the present time, all states use the winner-take-all system except two, Maine and Nebraska. These states allow a proportional electoral vote based on their congressional districts.

The article relates how, recently, various governors, senators and congressmen have suggested various schemes for revising the rules, most of them based on the award of electoral votes by the popular vote winners in their congressional districts. The most bizarre idea mentioned is one where two electoral votes would be given to the winner of the statewide vote, and the remainder would be divided according to the percentage of the popular vote that each candidate receives.

Most everyone agrees that at every governmental level and even within private associations of all types, the most logical and democratic way to determine a winner, whether it is for an individual or for the passage of a resolution, is by direct popular vote. This also should apply to the office of the president of the United States. The time has come to abolish the Electoral College rather than tinker with it.

George Stiegler, Ellicott City

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • The presidential power trap

      The presidential power trap

      Barack Obama is discovering that modern presidents have difficulty amassing political capital, which hinders their ability to enact a robust agenda

    • A divided GOP looks inward

      A divided GOP looks inward

      No political party enjoys losing an election, but a healthy party reacts to defeat — after a suitable period of grieving — by trying to figure out what went wrong.

    • Are looters going to jail?

      Are looters going to jail?

      I am wanting to know why I haven't read anything about the rioters being charged with the looting and burning of Baltimore. I understand that several hundred people were arrested but what has happened since?

    • Mayor needs a backbone

      Mayor needs a backbone

      Trying to eke out an existence in Baltimore has become a daily, even hourly, struggle for many. Oh, it was arduous enough before the recent spate of homicides occurred. But now it is simply a matter of good, law-abiding citizens of Baltimore being deprived of living in any semblance of peace ("Mother,...

    • Will Rodricks open his house to the poor?

      Will Rodricks open his house to the poor?

      In response to Dan Rodricks' proposal that our legislators support the leftist "Moving to Opportunity" agenda where the poor are moved to better neighborhoods through rent-subsidy vouchers, I have a better idea ("Time for leaders to do right thing for Baltimore's poorest kids," May 23).

    • Baltimore's death spiral

      Baltimore's death spiral

      Baltimore's mayor and state's attorney have taken the first steps to bankrupting this city. In addition to affirming obvious orders to allow space to destroy, the actions of the police make it clear that space was also provided for rioters to take control ("Baltimore needs an independent investigation...

    • Just obey the law and be respectful

      Just obey the law and be respectful

      If you cannot obey the law or teach your children to obey the laws of this country then why do you want the police to come to your aid? You call them your enemy and yet want their help in times of dire emergency. Get a grip on reality. If you want and desire their help, give them yours ("Officers...

    • Hubris of Baltimore 'plagues'

      Hubris of Baltimore 'plagues'

      Who is the Rev. James H. Bryant to invoke plagues on Baltimore? What kind of religious leader would dare to exhibit such hubris ("The 11th affliction," May 29)?

    Comments
    Loading

    61°