Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Ehrlich ignores evolution of marriage

In his column against gay marriage,Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.once again demonstrates why he is not the true heir and successor to Ron Smith ("Drawing a line at same-sex marriage," April 15). Mr. Smith and his keen intellect pursued truth whether it agreed with his prior beliefs or not while Mr. Ehrlich has shown again that he couches partisan viewpoints in intellectual language to disguise the truth.

There is, indeed, a likely coalition against the gay marriage act. Leaders in my own faith, the Catholic Church, are drumming up a bandwagon to get signatures for referendum against the act. I won't be signing it. Opponents all blindly and stubbornly ignore the fact that we are at this point recognizing the validity of gay marriage not in spite of Christian beliefs, but because of them.

There has already been a long evolution of marriage. Contrary to Mr. Ehrlich, Catholic bishops, and preachers who legislate, the word, "marriage," today doesn't mean at all the same thing it has meant through history. In the pre-Christian Greek world, marriage between a man and a woman was a social duty. This was not uncommon in the Jewish scriptures, too. A large part of marriage was economic and political: Young women were often married off to older established men to get them out of their families, to see that their economic future was assured, and often to cement ties or alliances between families, tribes, city-states and nations. Our current understanding of love between two people as a basis of marriage is part of the evolution of marriage, and a more modern one at that. Love stories such as the Song of Solomon and Hosea were remarkable because of their exceptionality, not their commonality.

Christianity is largely responsible for the development of the notion of sacrificial love between two marriage partners, a mirroring of the love of God for his people. Even as late as the middle ages, marriages were often arranged, and it took a good deal of preaching from religious leaders to decry the practice. Romeo and Juliet were remarkable for their love because otherwise they would likely have been forced to marry others to provide an extra alliance to their own warring families.

Today, we have already completely transformed the concept of marriage to a merging of two individuals based on a higher and completely sacrificial love to each other. The fact that up until now that arrangement was generally recognized as heterosexual is only one step along the very same path to the highest spiritual, democratic and humanistic attitude that started 2,000 years ago. The endorsement of gay marriage doesn't challenge our Christian heritage, it confirms it.

Mr. Ehrlich, and others like him, don't get that. You actually have to be open to truth to get it.

Samuel Castiglione, Randallstown

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • American values under Obama

    American values under Obama

    Two columns ago, I passed on a series of political observations from the heartland. Today, a snapshot of American values and viewpoints a decade and a half into the "new" millennium.

  • Ehrlich too negative, too partisan

    Ehrlich too negative, too partisan

    Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s cocky and aggressive partisanship make it evident why he couldn't govern effectively in Annapolis and was not re-elected for a second term ("Why Obama is viewed as weak," Nov. 30).

  • Ehrlich rants an embarrassment

    Ehrlich rants an embarrassment

    Not quite 10 years ago when I moved to Baltimore from a D.C. suburb, I made the decision to switch from The Washington Post to The Baltimore Sun for my daily news read. Ever since, I have had the paper delivered to my home on a daily basis. Even as it has gone down hill in content over that time....

  • Middle class value claims are a 'joke' [Commentary]

    Middle class value claims are a 'joke' [Commentary]

    It's the political season, which explains another column of "Things That Bug Me." Herewith my latest list for your consideration:

  • Respect the power of the pardon [Commentary]

    Respect the power of the pardon [Commentary]

    "[O]ne man appears to be a more eligible dispenser of the mercy of government, than a body of men."

  • Why Obama is viewed as weak

    Why Obama is viewed as weak

    Two recent Presidential pronouncements reflect the essential Barack Obama. Each also explains why so many view him to be the weakest of American presidents.

  • Unforced errors or tactical mistakes?

    Unforced errors or tactical mistakes?

    Political pundits like to label gratuitous political gaffes as "unforced errors" — mistakes that come out of right field without warning or reason.

  • Ehrlich's 'cult of anti-Obamaism'

    Ehrlich's 'cult of anti-Obamaism'

    Though I am 1960s retread boomer and unrepentant liberal who usually disagrees commentator Robert L. Ehrlich Jr., I read his column regularly. No surprise that he recently panned Obamacare — again — but what I never hear from Republicans is the Plan B, i.e., how we deal with the 40 million Americans...

Comments
Loading

73°