Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Why should taxpayers be forced to rescue people from their own bad decisions?

In the April 27 edition of The Sun there was a story by Kevin Rector about recently passed legislation to allow home prescriptions of Naloxone that could be administered to users of heroin who have overdosed ("Maryland families to get new tool in fight against drug overdoses"). In the article it was reported that the program will cost $50,000 in the next fiscal year and will increase over time. Why is it that every time someone makes a poor life decision, in this case using heroin, the remainder of society bears the burden for that poor decision?

In these austere times when taxpayers are told that they must continually pay more and more to cover the cost of the programs that our politicians invent, there must be some limit. In the article, Dr. Joshua Sharfstein, the Maryland Secretary of health and mental hygiene, said the costs would not be a major burden. I don't know about everyone else but I think $50,000 is a lot of money. We as taxpayers are constantly told that there is not enough money to cover the cost of providing basic services for all the people and we must continually pay more. If we didn't need to pay for programs that are designed for people who made poor decisions, perhaps the rest of us would be a little better off. While I feel sympathy for anyone who loses a loved one, these heroin addicts made the decision by themselves to abuse this drug.

Melvin Lindsay, Baltimore

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Drug overdose: the quiet epidemic

    Drug overdose: the quiet epidemic

    Violent crime gets the headlines, but we need to do more to prevent unnecessary substance-abuse deaths

  • Mfume: Sun is too quick to judge Mosby

    Mfume: Sun is too quick to judge Mosby

    Last November Baltimore elected the youngest prosecutor of any major American city, and Marilyn Mosby has brought a balanced approach and a steady hand to the work of restoring a sense of justice and civility to the city's criminal justice system.

  • Dirt bikers aren't the only danger on two wheels

    Dirt bikers aren't the only danger on two wheels

    The dirt bikers aren't Baltimore's only problem ("A '12 O'Clock Boys' theme park for Baltimore," Aug. 27). There are dangers from some other motorcyclists who display their "skills" on the Jones Falls Expressway, generally late at night or at 2 in the morning. Some of these cyclists must picture...

  • Think the Red Line is expensive? What about all those cars?

    Think the Red Line is expensive? What about all those cars?

    Ben Groff very articulately expressed many of the same sentiments I have about the Red Line and transit in general ("Why killing the Red Line was a mistake," Aug. 25). His emphasis on the negative aspects on car-based transportation is especially significant. I would add that the apparent convenience...

  • Shouldn't we read the Iran deal before supporting it?

    Shouldn't we read the Iran deal before supporting it?

    I find it un-American that your paper and many in Congress can apparently make a decision to agree with the proposed Iran nuclear deal without reading it or knowing what the side agreements the UN made contain. You are all taking the word of people that have a record of distorting the facts or...

  • Why not just give Iran the bomb?

    Why not just give Iran the bomb?

    I have a great idea for an update to the Iran deal that would save a lot of time. We should go ahead and provide Iran with nuclear weapons and also some ICBMs. This will substantially shorten the time necessary for them to develop or purchase them on their own.

Comments
Loading
79°