Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Drone use must be restricted

On Wednesday, I was fortunate to have attended Medea Benjamin's talk on drone warfare at the Pratt Library. It's time Americans began to understand and speak out against the misuse of this technology. There is no basic problem with unmanned aerial vehicles, but their deployment and purpose needs far more oversight. How fortuitous President Barack Obama has begun the conversation ("Setting limits on drones," May 24).

Mercifully, the CIA "fly-boys" are to be relieved of their drone duties. Killing alleged enemy combatants belongs in the hands of the military. The CIA never should have been given this "black-ops" toy to play with in the first place.

I've studied the drone phenomena for some time. The technology can be useful and of value in war, but the collateral damage (i.e. civilians accidentally targeted) is unacceptable. This has been a powerful al-Qaida recruiting tool.

You are correct to state that "the U.S. Constitution has taken some hard hits," but in actuality it has been ignored. Article One, Sec 8 states the authority to go to war lies with Congress, not the President. And when it comes to fighting terrorism, it might be wise to examine why America is so hated in certain areas. Instead of "supporting democracy, addressing chronic poverty … improving education and nurturing entrepreneurship..." we need to look at ourselves and ask what we have done to antagonize so many who wish to destroy us.

Rosalind Heid, Baltimore

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Civilization has no place for drones
    Civilization has no place for drones

    There is no avoiding an international drone race; they should be banned like chemical weapons

  • Time to re-think U.S. use of drones
    Time to re-think U.S. use of drones

    Drones over Syria? Hold on! ("CIA eyes drone strikes in Syria," March 16). The whole business of drone strikes on nations with whom we are not at war gets murkier and more distasteful daily — and cries out for transparency from the Obama administration on drone practice and policy,...

  • Rand Paul's filibuster worked
    Rand Paul's filibuster worked

    Our view: A filibuster produces some clarity — though not enough — about the Obama administration's policies on domestic drone strikes

  • When liberals and libertarians unite
    When liberals and libertarians unite

    We can't tell the real Americans who love and defend our country from the liberals who hate America anymore ("Paul's victory," March 8).

  • Obama administration ignores the big leaks
    Obama administration ignores the big leaks

    It is interesting that the Obama administration (and I am sure Attorney General Eric Holder knows nothing about this either) is going after a Fox News reporter, but nothing has been done about the White House leaks of the "hit list" for drones or the cyber attack on Iran ("U.S. targeted Fox...

  • Torture is un-American

    It was great to read your editorial "The truth about torture" (April 23). It confirmed what the peace community has argued for years:

  • Setting limits on drones
    Setting limits on drones

    Our view: President Obama's call to put U.S. counter-terrorism policy on a more virtuous path is an overdue step in the correct direction

  • Rodricks wrong on bay pollution
    Rodricks wrong on bay pollution

    It is time for those writing for The Sun's editorial pages to check their facts. Columnist Dan Rodricks writes that poultry farmers are allowing their chicken manure to run into the Chesapeake Bay ("Larry Hogan has a chance to be a green governor," Dec. 13.

Comments
Loading