Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Where's the concern for the innocents killed by U.S. drones?

President Barack Obama, the Rev. M. Cristina Paglinauan and columnist Dan Rodricks all have expressed sorrow and outrage over the slaughter of innocent children in Newtown, Conn. ("Stand vigil for gun victims and new laws," Dec. 23). Yet their vocal concern is in stark contrast to their silence over all the children who have been murdered in Mr. Obama's drone attacks.

What applies to children murdered by a mentally ill gunman should also apply to those murdered by drone attacks in Pakistan, Yemen, Afghanistan and Iraq.

Two days after the Newtown shooting, nine children between the ages of 9 and 13 were killed by a cluster bomb in Afghanistan. So far, 178 children have been killed by U.S. drone strikes.

For these children there are no front-page headlines, no presidential tears, no celebrity videos, no pictures of tiny coffins and no candlelight vigil. Why? Is it because the children of Newtown have white skin and those murdered by U.S. drones have brown skin? Did those brown-skinned parents love their children any less than we love ours?

There is ultimately very little any society we can do to prevent deranged individuals from carrying out attacks similar to Newtown. But we can stop the slaughter of innocents carried out by our government.

In an attempt to generate support for their political agenda, gun control advocates have seized on the Newtown tragedy while deliberately ignoring the children's corpses that continue to pile up as a result of the Obama's administrations actions.

If the Reverend Paglinauan's candlelight vigil on the National Mall in Washington New Year's Eve is going to include candles for the children killed by the US government, I offer my praise and support. But if not, I offer nothing except disgust and revulsion at her hypocrisy.

Robert Mewshaw, Brooklandville

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Time to re-think U.S. use of drones

    Time to re-think U.S. use of drones

    Drones over Syria? Hold on! ("CIA eyes drone strikes in Syria," March 16). The whole business of drone strikes on nations with whom we are not at war gets murkier and more distasteful daily — and cries out for transparency from the Obama administration on drone practice and policy, especially abroad.

  • Rand Paul's filibuster worked

    Rand Paul's filibuster worked

    Our view: A filibuster produces some clarity — though not enough — about the Obama administration's policies on domestic drone strikes

  • Obama made U.S. weaker, more vulnerable

    I must live in a different country than Sen. Jim Rosapepe ("U.S. stronger, safer under President Obama," Oct. 27). Unfortunately, my country has a terrible economy with 23 million people out of work. In four years, the price of gasoline has doubled, the average family has seen a yearly income loss...

  • Middle East mess was born in the U.S.A.

    Middle East mess was born in the U.S.A.

    American meddling in the Arab world has produced decades of disasters, so why are we still there?

  • The real problem with David Petraeus

    There are a lot worse things going on in our country right now than Gen. David Petraeus cheating on his wife, and one of them is our country's invidious use of drone warfare. The worst part about it is that we have been brainwashed to believe that it is an acceptable plan of action. The only television...

  • The law of drones

    The law of drones

    Our view: Despite Congress' efforts get more information about U.S. drone strikes abroad, details of the program remain as elusive as ever

  • Petraeus thought he was above the law

    Gen. David Petraeus' actions over the past several years show that he considers himself more of a prince than a member of the armed forces who answers to his civilian commander-in-chief ("Did Petraeus have to step down?" Nov. 13).

  • Drone strikes stir hatred of the U.S.

    "No more drones" is the right policy, as writer Agnes Merrick said in a recent op-ed ("The real Petraeus problem," Dec. 8). Bravo to The Sun for printing it.