Get unlimited digital access to $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

DNA testing isn't like taking fingerprints

The Sun's reasoning regarding the recent ruling on DNA collection is severely flawed ("Court is right on DNA," June 4).

DNA is not 21st-century fingerprinting, and it does more than identify a person. It's likely there is yet undetermined information stored in the "non-coding" section of DNA.

It is irrelevant whether the information gathered is used or not. The very fact that the state has taken the information from an individual violates the Fourth Amendment.

It can be likened to taking someone's computer. The police may only seek specific information, but they have access to everything on it. In fact, they have to search the entire computer.

In other words, they are conducting a full search of the person's effects. This is not only objectionable but a clear violation of the Fourth Amendment.

Russell Weisfield, Arvada, Colo.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Court's DNA decision serves public safety and justice
    Court's DNA decision serves public safety and justice

    Our view: The only difference between collecting genetic information and fingerprints from arrestees is that DNA matches are far more accurate

  • Pot is no harmless drug

    In response to the recent letter from Stan White of Dillon, Colo. ("Fight heroin by legalizing pot," March 3), I would point out that the disease of addiction is not drug-specific. I do agree with him that people who buy weed "on the streets" have a better than average opportunity to find...

  • The lessons of Ferguson

    The Justice Department on Wednesday released a devastating critique of police and city officials in Ferguson, Mo., where an unarmed black teenager was fatally shot by an officer last year. Though the department did not find cause to bring a civil rights indictment against the officer who killed...

  • Who do the Democrats think they're fooling?
    Who do the Democrats think they're fooling?

    I am disappointed but not surprised by the furor over whether to fully fund the Department of Homeland Security ("Congress OKs deal to avoid shutdown at Homeland Security," Feb. 27).

  • The stigma of suicide for those nearing the end of life

    If the proposed physician assisted suicide legislation were referred to instead as "physician assisted end of life," perhaps the stigma attached would be more palatable ("Dying former official a focus of Maryland assisted suicide bill," Feb. 14).

  • Protecting the bay is a shared responsibility
    Protecting the bay is a shared responsibility

    I don't claim to know the details of Maryland's so-called "rain tax," but I do believe that improving the Chesapeake Bay is a responsibility all of us share ("Senators hear bid to repeal law requiring stormwater fees," March 3).