A Sun editorial correctly noted that the pursuit of expensive technology for the classroom when there is little knowledge of its effectiveness may be ill advised ("Digital classrooms," Feb. 11).
I am also struck that the language used by proponents to describe and prioritize this endeavor is essentially hollow jargon. Capabilities for "learning 24/7" are found in the individual and are values that are culturally transmitted.
How learning may be better when a cloud-connected tablet is used rather than a book, paper and pencil is simply an assumption that the more technology the better.
Unless this technology can provide a better means for a kid to write a clear paragraph, explain an idea or understand and apply logical and critical thinking, it's not the gods but ourselves that are crazy.
D. Druckman, Baltimore
To respond to this letter, send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org. Please include your name and contact information.