Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Multiculturalism is no enemy of democracy

In the wake of the recent death of a British soldier at the hands of extremists, former Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s commentary misappropriates the term "multiculturalism" and consequently muddles the discussion ("Multiculturalism is the enemy of democracy," June 2).

Mr. Ehrlich argues that multiculturalism, which he sees as promoted by progressives, and which entails the maintenance of separate cultural enclaves that do not partake in American values, has no place in the United States, since it disrupts the image of the melting-pot that remains a powerful metaphor in our quasi-mythological self-conception.

Whether intentionally or not, he presents a false dichotomy between assimilation and what he labels multiculturalism. Few would argue that the phenomenon he describes — something more akin to cultural segregation — should be a model for cosmopolitan nations like the United States.

In reality, however, immigrants do not choose between the two extremes of keeping their native culture completely intact (a virtual impossibility in a new environment) and changing everything about their social identity.

Instead, people living in a new culture preserve some practices and beliefs while adopting others they find among their new neighbors. True multiculturalism is merely the recognition that while we may share certain things — such as Mr. Ehrlich's examples of "personal freedoms, baseball and apple pie" — there is no need to share everything in common.

Contrary to what the former governor implies, there is no homogeneous "American culture" with which all recent immigrants are in conflict.

Suggesting that good-hearted Americans should refuse to tolerate the continued traditions of people both from foreign countries and from culturally diverse regions within our own borders does not contribute to the American ideals he espouses; on the contrary, it contradicts them.

Regardless of how the London attacks come to be interpreted in the future, they surely were not the harbingers of multicultural doom Mr. Ehrlich takes them to be.

Doug Bafford, Eldersburg

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • American values under Obama

    American values under Obama

    Two columns ago, I passed on a series of political observations from the heartland. Today, a snapshot of American values and viewpoints a decade and a half into the "new" millennium.

  • Ehrlich too negative, too partisan

    Ehrlich too negative, too partisan

    Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s cocky and aggressive partisanship make it evident why he couldn't govern effectively in Annapolis and was not re-elected for a second term ("Why Obama is viewed as weak," Nov. 30).

  • Ehrlich rants an embarrassment

    Ehrlich rants an embarrassment

    Not quite 10 years ago when I moved to Baltimore from a D.C. suburb, I made the decision to switch from The Washington Post to The Baltimore Sun for my daily news read. Ever since, I have had the paper delivered to my home on a daily basis. Even as it has gone down hill in content over that time....

  • Middle class value claims are a 'joke' [Commentary]

    Middle class value claims are a 'joke' [Commentary]

    It's the political season, which explains another column of "Things That Bug Me." Herewith my latest list for your consideration:

  • Respect the power of the pardon [Commentary]

    Respect the power of the pardon [Commentary]

    "[O]ne man appears to be a more eligible dispenser of the mercy of government, than a body of men."

  • Why Obama is viewed as weak

    Why Obama is viewed as weak

    Two recent Presidential pronouncements reflect the essential Barack Obama. Each also explains why so many view him to be the weakest of American presidents.

  • Unforced errors or tactical mistakes?

    Unforced errors or tactical mistakes?

    Political pundits like to label gratuitous political gaffes as "unforced errors" — mistakes that come out of right field without warning or reason.

  • Ehrlich's 'cult of anti-Obamaism'

    Ehrlich's 'cult of anti-Obamaism'

    Though I am 1960s retread boomer and unrepentant liberal who usually disagrees commentator Robert L. Ehrlich Jr., I read his column regularly. No surprise that he recently panned Obamacare — again — but what I never hear from Republicans is the Plan B, i.e., how we deal with the 40 million Americans...