Get unlimited digital access to $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Government right to push for reduced use of antipsychotics for dementia patients

Behavioral and psychiatric symptoms, such as depression, delusions, hallucinations, yelling, wandering and aggression, affect 80-90 percent of individuals with dementia at some point during the course of their illness. For the vast majority of individuals with dementia, these troubling symptoms are short-lived and can be successfully managed by caregivers who use behavioral modifications and non-pharmacological interventions such as reassurance, social activities to relieve boredom or agitation, reminiscence, and exercise.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) use of policy efforts to reduce the inappropriate use of antipsychotics among dementia patients in nursing homes should be applauded. However, we must be careful not to demonize all use of these medications.

As indicated in the oped by Dr. Cheryl Phillips, ("The false promise of dementia drugs," Aug. 13), there are no medications, including antipsychotics, that are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of behavioral and psychiatric symptoms of dementia. There is modest evidence in the medical literature to support the short term use of antipsychotics among a small percentage of individuals with dementia who have persistent and distressing psychotic symptoms or physically aggressive symptoms that pose a significant danger to themselves or others. Before and during the use of any medication to impact symptoms of dementia, behavioral approaches should be used, informed discussions with the individual and family about risks and benefits should occur, and ongoing monitoring for effectiveness and side effects should be present.

Safe reductions in the use of antipsychotics can occur only when family and professional caregivers have access to education and coaching on the use of effective non-pharmacological alternatives. While there is some evidence about the effectiveness of behavioral interventions, results vary, and the use of these techniques is not a one size fits all approach. Obtaining the financial resources to test behavioral interventions in real world settings is challenging and clinical improvements are often modest at best. Knowledge of the person with dementia, the promotion of physical activity, and trial and error are often our best teachers when using behavioral approaches.

If we are serious about improving the behavioral health of individuals with dementia, we must devote time and resources to caregivers who face the daily challenges of understanding and managing behavioral symptoms. We must also reserve the option for appropriate short term use of pharmacological interventions when symptoms are severe enough to warrant their use.

Elizabeth Galik, Baltimore

The writer is an assistant professor at the University of Maryland School of Nursing.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • The false promise of dementia drugs

    Antipsychotics rarely help and present significant dangers

  • Baltimore the 'Star-Spangled City'
    Baltimore the 'Star-Spangled City'

    A city motto is to woo tourists, conventions and businesses, not just shipping ("Baltimore: Gateway to America," Jan. 25). Most Americans don't know or care that Baltimore was an important port for immigration and commerce because Baltimore is 300 miles farther inland than any other East...

  • Don't give a free pass to polluters, Mr. Hogan
    Don't give a free pass to polluters, Mr. Hogan

    I am a 79-year-old retired assistant superintendent of Baltimore County Public Schools and a former resident of Dundalk. I lived and worked in the Dundalk area for over 50 years. Though I am retired, I was active in Dundalk leading community projects and civic organizations for many of those...

  • Replace the B&P tunnel
    Replace the B&P tunnel

    There's an elephant in the room underneath West Baltimore that no one is talking about. While transit supporters and critics fight over the fate of the Red and Purple lines, this elephant grows bigger. The elephant in question is the Baltimore and Potomac tunnel ("From vibrations to mosquitoes,...

  • Spend HUD grant on housing, not government
    Spend HUD grant on housing, not government

    Wasn't there a 10-year plan to rid Baltimore of its homeless? Trust me, too many jobs are connected to the $48.3 million federal grant to housing and service programs in Maryland so that is never going to happen ("$48.3M awarded to homeless services programs in Maryland," Jan. 26)!

  • Hogan should support air pollution rules
    Hogan should support air pollution rules

    Two days ago, I was watching an adorable young girl running on the playground in Baltimore chasing her father and trying to catch him. Eventually, she plopped down near me and we started chatting. After asking her if she had caught her father, she said that she really hadn't actually caught...

  • Md. should exercise caution on the economy
    Md. should exercise caution on the economy

    Why is Del. Maggie McIntosh so confident that the economy is going to bring Maryland out of its financial problems this year ("Budget to have lasting effect," Jan. 27)? Obviously she does not follow the same financial news outlets that I do.

  • Hogan should support Red, Purple lines
    Hogan should support Red, Purple lines

    Kudos to Gov. Larry Hogan for preserving money in his budget for the Red and Purple lines ("Hogan budget would cut state worker pay, city school aid," Jan. 22) while he considers their future. As the governor moves toward a final decision, he will have the opportunity to review work done by...