Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Deficit impasse can be solved — if Congress looks out for the people and not just the rich

How pathetically sad and disturbing that the financial stability of our nation is in such a precarious, perilous state, and our credit rating is now being threatened by two top rating agencies, Moody's Investors and Standard and Poor's. The quick fix is to raise the debt ceiling, but now the Republicans have decided we can't just do that because it is not fiscally responsible, and drastic cuts are needed to reduce the deficit first, without the need for increased revenue. This is easy to proclaim now that we have a Democrat as president, expecting him to ask the middle class, the poor, the elderly on fixed incomes to tighten their belts and make the sacrifices necessary by draconian stripping of necessary public programs such as Social Security and Medicare.

Nobody really wants this, but the Republicans in Washington seem to think they do. But why now when the debt ceiling has been raised seven times in the past decade under George W. Bush without anyone batting an eye? Where was the scrutiny and the concern when the previous president decided to wage two wars while at the same time cutting revenues by allowing tax breaks and loopholes favoring the very wealthy and "too big to fail" corporations, which have reaped enormous profits at the expense of our citizens and the environment? Where was the outrage when the housing market was ballooning to an obvious breaking point and average citizens began to see their wages stagnate or slip?

The middle class has been willing to make concessions, and they have been doing so for a very long time, but we are spent out. Now, the very wealthy and the corporations that have taken advantage of everything this country has to offer continue to refuse to give an inch to bring this economy back from the brink. They have hoarded their wealth, outsourced jobs, and enjoyed paying little or no taxes as a result. Yes, House Speaker John Boehner, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, "where are the jobs," indeed?

The politicizing is destroying this country, and the Republicans are not interested in stopping it, even as they are now backed into a corner. The sad truth is that a very easy solution is not only possible but necessary. You cannot have a government that seeks to address the needs of its people without adequate revenue. The tax breaks that George Bush and the Republicans have allowed while he was president have given our country this terrible debt. In 2000, we actually had a surplus.

Military spending and outrageous tax breaks for those who can most afford it have destroyed this economy. It is time for the Republicans to start acting like adults and realize that they have been elected to represent their constituents, all of them, and that they must make decisions in the best interest of our country and its people, not just in the interest of the corporate elite and the wealthy that support them. If they are not willing to do this, then they should be the ones "flipping burgers" for minimum wage.

Barbara McNamara, Aberdeen

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Schaller fails to see danger of U.S. debt

    Columnist Thomas F. Schaller's analysis is incredibly myopic ("Avoiding Europe's austerity nightmare," April 18). To compare the economic condition of the U.S. to those of Greece or Spain at the beginning of the economic crisis is comparing apples and oranges.

  • Military spending is misplaced U.S. priority

    On April 17, I will be protesting war taxes at Baltimore's main post office. I realize that taxes fund many good programs — education, environment and diplomacy. But sadly when 57 percent of the federal budget goes to the Pentagon, the government's priorities are out of touch with the pressing...

  • A better budget remedy than the Buffett rule

    You end your editorial on the Buffett Rule ("The Buffett Rule backlash," April 13) with the question, "Where will the $50 billion come from to balance the budget, if not from this minimum tax plan?"

  • Skeptical of Buffett and need for higher taxes

    First, I'm an 80-year-old living on Social Security, and I know all the tax loopholes need to be closed ("The Buffett Rule backlash," April 13). But isn't it correct that Warren Buffett owes the IRS a great deal of taxes for a number of years? Let's have a true picture of Mr. Buffett.

  • The Buffett Rule backlash

    The Buffett Rule backlash

    Our view: Taxing the wealthy at rates others already face wouldn't solve the nation's deficit, but it would restore a modicum of fairness to the tax code

  • Godless Republicans turn back on poor and sick

    Some churchmen take exception to some of President Barack Obama's positions on matters of faith. I suggest these men of faith take a closer look at the true meaning of religion. All three Abrahamic religions — Christianity, Judaism and Islam — have as their central theme the commandments to protect...