Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
NewsOpinionReaders Respond

Death penalty used too rarely

Laws and LegislationExecutive BranchMartin O'Malley

As usual, Gov. Martin O'Malley, the poster boy for liberal diatribe, has it all wrong again. In seeking to abolish the death penalty, Governor O'Malley cites the "fact" that even when capital punishment was the law of the land, the rate of murder showed no significant decrease. His pathetic argument that capital punishment is no deterrent is almost laughable.

In order to expect the death penalty to deter crime, one must insure its proper application. Since 1976, 17,569 murders have been committed in the state of Maryland. Of those, only five individuals have been executed. John Thanos in 1994, Flint Hunt in 1997, Tyrone Gilliam in 1998, Stephen Oken in 2004, and Wesley Baker in 2005. There are currently five murderers sitting on Maryland's death row; three of whom have been there for 30 years. It is, indeed, a sorry situation that when 17,569 lives have been brutally snuffed out, the state of Maryland can only implement the death penalty in 1/25th of 1 percent of the cases! Any rational human being could not possibly believe that any law could be a deterrent when applied at this ridiculously low rate.

Let's see the state of Maryland up that to 50 or 60 percent, and then Mr. O'Malley will understand what deterrent means.

Mark T. Pfaff, Ocean City

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    Laws and LegislationExecutive BranchMartin O'Malley
    • A case for the death penalty [Letter]
      A case for the death penalty [Letter]

      There is a reason even some libertarians support the death penalty, albeit in highly restricted cases. That's because of situations just like this — a brutal and thoroughly unjustifiable murder (some murders are justifiable), a family torn apart and a more-likely-than-not...

    • Why all the sympathy for condemned killers? [Letter]
      Why all the sympathy for condemned killers? [Letter]

      Why is it the convicted criminals get all the sympathy from some segments of the public? ("Death penalty limbo," April 29.) The "hysteria" over a humane way to execute a heinous, cold blooded killer is almost hysterical. The way that was developed to humanely execute a...

    • Don't shed tears for a killer's 'botched' execution [Letter]
      Don't shed tears for a killer's 'botched' execution [Letter]

      Once again the bleeding hearts of this country are crying over the so-called botched execution of a man who tortured, raped, shot then buried alive a 19-year-old recent high school graduate ("Fresh execution questions," May 1). Why aren't those tears being shed over Stephanie...

    • There's no such thing as a 'humane' execution [Letter]
      There's no such thing as a 'humane' execution [Letter]

      There is a surreal feeling that comes from reading the media commentary of the botched execution of Clayton Lockett in Oklahoma ("Fresh execution questions," May 1). It is sort of like listening to a discussion about rape in which it is assumed that rape is OK as long as one does it...

    • Death penalty limbo [Editorial]
      Death penalty limbo [Editorial]

      Our view: With prospects for O'Malley to commute capital sentences uncertain, those running to replace him should address the issue of Md.'s death row

    • Killer of four deserves death penalty [Letter]

      As described in the recent article, "Escapee from Michigan prison caught in Indiana" (Feb. 4), the fugitive in question was serving four life sentences for killing four people in 1993. The murderer escaped from prison, then kidnapped a woman who fortunately was able to escape...

    Comments
    Loading