Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Where are savings in death penalty repeal?

I read Gerald Stansbury's postulation ("Unrepresentative committee blocks Md. death penalty repeal vote," Jan. 2) that the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee doesn't include enough "people of color," by which he means African-Americans. Can't take issue with that. He may be right, and it certainly isn't the first time that something failed to be representative — take, for instance the recent gerrymandering of the Western Maryland congressional district.

But what I do question is his math. He further postulates that repeal of this long-standing deterrent would "save Maryland millions of dollars and prevent future murders." How does that work? As far as I have been able to determine, it costs many thousands of dollars annually (more than many family household budgets) to house and feed prison inmates, particularly since prisons have to comply with progressive interpretations of "cruel and unusual punishment" to mean that we must give them access to the outside world (telephone, television, publications, Internet), physical conditioning (exercise equipment), free access to the latest medical care and to legal representation. All things that many of us in the outside world simply cannot afford. If we have more inmates, we have to have more and larger prisons with a commensurate increase in staff.

So ignoring for a moment the philosophical argument about "an eye for an eye," how do you save money by maintaining death row inmates for many years instead of eliminating them from the prison budget? And exactly what resources do you free up to prevent further murders? The writer's argument might be more palatable if he could clear this up.

Kenneth Kent, Cambridge

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • Bring back the death penalty in Md.
      Bring back the death penalty in Md.

      Baltimore's very own "Public Enemy No. 1" has been sentenced to life plus 240 years for a double murder ("Killer gets life plus 240 years, flips off top prosecutor," March 24).

    • Keep the death penalty abolished
      Keep the death penalty abolished

      I find it amazing that Del. Pat McDonough feels that reinstating the death penalty demands his time and resources as a priority in our state despite the numerous more pressing issues ("Del. McDonough seeks to restore death penalty in some cases," Jan. 26). He references two recent police killings...

    • Choose life and mercy — even for heinous crimes
      Choose life and mercy — even for heinous crimes

      While Baltimore County State's Attorney Scott Shellenberger and Towson University professor Richard Vatz have outlined many secular reasons for reinstating the death penalty ("Maryland should reinstate the death penalty," Jan. 6), I suggest that we let dead dogs lie and that we let the death penalty...

    • A death penalty rebuttal, point by point
      A death penalty rebuttal, point by point

      It was good of Baltimore County State's Attorney Scott Shellenberger and Towson University professor Richard E. Vatz to present their best arguments for reinstating the death penalty in Maryland — or anywhere else, I suppose ("Reinstate the death penalty, Maryland," Jan. 7). Let's see if any of...

    • Who says innocent people are never executed?
      Who says innocent people are never executed?

      It's ironic that your newspaper should publish a letter from our most ignorant apologists for the death penalty the same week that the Innocence Project freed yet another death row inmate from being wrongfully executed ("Maryland should reinstate the death penalty," Jan. 6).

    • Killing each other won't make us safer
      Killing each other won't make us safer

      Reading Scott Shellenberger's and Richard E. Vatz's pleas for a reinstatement of the death penalty in Maryland reminds me of a proverbial ditty my mother was fond of during my childhood ("Maryland should reinstate the death penalty," Jan. 6).

    • The death penalty is dead; let's move on
      The death penalty is dead; let's move on

      Each one of the arguments raised in Scott Shellenberger and Richard E. Vatz's recent op-ed calling for reinstating the death penalty in Maryland was considered during the debate on capital punishment ("Maryland should reinstate the death penalty," Jan. 6).

    • Lethal injections don't have to be botched [Letter]
      Lethal injections don't have to be botched [Letter]

      Having just read your latest editorial about an inmate's execution ("Another botched injection,http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/bs-ed-lethal-injection-20140725%2C0%2C1958095.story July 27), two things stand out. The first is obvious — when something like this happens, it immediately becomes...

    Comments
    Loading

    64°