Summer Sale! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Crabbing moratorium isn't the answer [Letter]

In response to Dan Rodricks' article, "Stop tinkering: Ban crabbing for a year" (May 4) I must say that his solution to the Chesapeake Bay's crab shortage, placing a moratorium on crab harvesting, is too simple and elementary for this complex and multi-faceted problem.

The Chesapeake Bay blue crab industry makes up $700 million of the state of Maryland's economy. There are many individuals and businesses involved in this economy, starting with watermen, marinas and boat repairs, bait and tackle supplies, truck drivers, fuel companies, crab wholesalers, crab picking houses, carry-out crab houses, sit down restaurants, refrigeration services, boiler services, and the list could continue. Mr. Rodricks suggests that the watermen take off a year and plant trees. OK, what about all the others who are affected, Mr. Rodricks? Do you have any ideas for their income and livelihood for that moratorium period? I think this part of the problem is a bit more broad than you think, Mr. Rodricks. I have two carry-out crab houses that employ approximately 50 people, and I know I would have to release many of them if a moratorium was issued.

Let me just say this about our blue crabs: They are resilient, and they are survivors. Do a little research for yourself on the life of a blue crab, you will be astounded at their tenacity to survive!

That said, one way to help the blue crabs survive would be to allow fishermen to harvest greater numbers of rockfish from the bay. One waterman recently cut open a harvested rockfish to find 157 juvenile blue crabs in its belly! Wow! That's just one fish. Fishermen should be allowed to harvest the red drum also; like rockfish, eating machines, feeding primarily on juvenile blue crabs. This Chesapeake Bay of ours is out of balance right now — too many fish, not enough crabs. You can't have a bay thick with rockfish and red drum and expect to have acceptable numbers of blue crabs. It can't and won't happen. Mother Nature runs in cycles, and sooner or later will resolve this issue, but we can help counter the balance by allowing more fish to be harvested.

Scientists and the Department of Natural Resources, along with watermen, have been strategizing for the past few years about new regulations to protect the blue crab resource. These strategies have been paying dividends and should continue to be revisited and tweaked for the protection of our blue crab. We now need regulations relaxed on fishing to keep the balance in check. And the polar vortex, Mr. Rodricks, may have killed a few of the older crabs in the bay, but count this freeze a blessing. A freeze can kill parasites, bacteria and algae in the bay, cleaning up the bay water. That's a good thing! Thanks for your concern, Mr. Rodricks; however, I think you should stop tinkering with complex environmental issues and maybe concentrate on less complex issues, like politics.

Richard Anderson, Jarrettsville

To respond to this letter, send an email to Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • What about Pa. manure?

    What about Pa. manure?

    On an almost recurring basis lately, The Sun has devoted itself to bringing to everyone's attention the Eastern Shore poultry industry's polluted runoff flowing into the Chesapeake Bay ("Larry Hogan has a chance to be a green governor," Dec. 13). Attention should be directed to the Amish farmers...

  • Hogan can protect farms and open space

    Hogan can protect farms and open space

    Congratulations to Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan on his inauguration. Mr. Hogan ran a terrific campaign, and we all look forward to his leadership on one of the most important roles, safeguarding the lands and waters of this beautiful state.

  • Cleaning up the Bay

    Cleaning up the Bay

    I was pleased to read that the EPA finds Maryland is making progress toward our clean water goals for the Chesapeake Bay and that we're on course to reduce phosphorus pollution ("EPA finds Maryland mostly on track in Bay cleanup, but Pennsylvania lagging badly," June 12).

  • New rules needed to protect Eastern Shore waterways

    New rules needed to protect Eastern Shore waterways

    After talking about it for years, Maryland finally has proposed long-overdue regulations on phosphorous pollution from animal manure in the Chesapeake Bay ("Hogan vows to fight farm pollution rules," Dec. 8).

  • Big Ag must be held to account for bay pollution

    Big Ag must be held to account for bay pollution

    Dan Rodricks' arguments for protecting the Chesapeake Bay from pollution from chicken farms could have been even stronger ("Larry Hogan has a chance to be a green governor," Dec. 13).

  • Kamenetz is pandering on stormwater fees

    Kamenetz is pandering on stormwater fees

    Thank your for your recent article, "Reduced stormwater fees sought," (Jan. 17) and the editorial covering the same topics ("Backtracking on the bay," Jan. 22). Baltimore County Executive Kevin Kamenetz seems to be pandering to special interests and positioning himself for higher office. His ideas...

  • Md. leaders protect funds for bay cleanup

    Md. leaders protect funds for bay cleanup

    Senators Barbara Mikulski and Ben Cardin, along with Rep. Steny Hoyer, deserve our thanks for securing funding in the recent omnibus appropriations bill to keep Maryland on track to cleaning up the Chesapeake Bay and its rivers and streams ("For better or worse, spending bill passes," Dec. 15).

  • Excess phosphorous is killing the bay

    Excess phosphorous is killing the bay

    In the days following Dan Rodricks' column "Larry Hogan has a chance to be a green governor" (Dec. 13), your paper has been flooded with letters opposing the phosphorus management tool (PMT) regulations and opposing Mr. Rodricks position. On the surface it would seem that both letters in support...