Save 75% - Only $49.99 for 1 full year! digitalPLUS subscription offer ends 12/1
NewsOpinionReaders Respond

For the sake of future generations, Cove Point must be stopped [Letter]

QuakerismEnergy ResourcesGlobal WarmingEnergy SavingPetroleum Industry

Thank you for covering the controversy regarding the proposed Dominion liquefied natural gas (LNG) export facility at Cove Point ("Calvert County Cove Point opponents, supporters flood state with comments," April 3).

The Cove Point project has far-reaching potential impact on human health and environmental quality in every phase of the process — extraction, transportation, liquefaction, shipping, re-gasification and distribution of the natural gas abroad. We are especially concerned about the impact Dominion's proposal will have on climate and air quality in Maryland. The proposed 130 megawatt power plant required to liquefy the natural gas would be Maryland's fourth largest greenhouse gas emitter, just behind our three major coal-fired power plants.

Dominion also has failed to demonstrate that it will minimize emissions of harmful air contaminants, such as nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide, from both the facility and associated marine vessels, as required by the federal Clean Air Act. A system of pipelines and compressor stations across Maryland would threaten our ecosytem and quality of life. The project also threatens the last remaining fresh water aquifer in Lusby, Maryland. Finally, the increased demand for natural gas will result in increased pressure to open Maryland to fracking operations and undermine the O'Malley administration's efforts to implement clean energy and energy efficiency initiatives to reduce Maryland's greenhouse gas emissions.

We believe that any thorough and objective examination of the harm vs. benefits of this proposal will show that the Maryland public will come out a significant loser, while the gas industry profits.

Currently the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is not even requiring an Environmental Impact Statement for this $3.8 billion undertaking. We recommend that the Maryland Public Service Commission deny permission to construct the proposed power plant and that a full Environmental Impact Statement be required.

On behalf of Quakers (Friends) from nine Quaker Meetings in central and southern Maryland, and with future generations in our hearts and on our minds,

Sarah Bur, Baltimore

The writer is clerk of the Chesapeake Quarterly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers).

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
QuakerismEnergy ResourcesGlobal WarmingEnergy SavingPetroleum Industry
  • O'Malley jumps to a pro-fracking conclusion [Letter]
    O'Malley jumps to a pro-fracking conclusion [Letter]

    I was surprised to see in Tim Wheeler's report on the latest Cove Point permit ("State gives gas export facility go-ahead," July 23) that Gov. Martin O'Malley has decided that fracked gas is a bridge fuel and that fracking can be done safely if the government sets the "highest and best"...

  • How does shipping LNG abroad promote U.S. energy independence? [Letter]
    How does shipping LNG abroad promote U.S. energy independence? [Letter]

    I'm confused about your report that Virginia-based energy company Dominion wants to convert it's little-used natural gas import terminal at Cove Point into an export facility ("A key win for LNG facility," July 24).

  • Why are we exporting natural gas? [Letter]
    Why are we exporting natural gas? [Letter]

    After years of hearing that the U.S. is too dependent on foreign oil, and that our reliance on fossil fuels is ultimately unsustainable anyway, why are we now developing ways to export natural gas ("A key win for LNG facility," July 24)?

  • Cove Point plant threatens nearby residents' health and safety [Letter]
    Cove Point plant threatens nearby residents' health and safety [Letter]

    In its permit ruling last month, the Maryland Public Service Commission stated that the proposed Cove Point liquefied natural gas refinery is not in the public interest and would be a net economic negative for the state. That should have been the end of the discussion and the project should...

  • Delaney's energy policy a muddle [Letter]
    Delaney's energy policy a muddle [Letter]

    Rep. John Delaney's commentary ("Natural gas is the right choice for the U.S.," April 2) speaks for the energy and job needs of Canada, Crimea, Europe, Russia, Ukraine the Midwestern United States and southern Maryland. Unmentioned in this geopolitical academic exercise are the energy and job...

  • Cove Point: Study but decide soon [Letter]
    Cove Point: Study but decide soon [Letter]

    As expected, Mike Tidwell of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network writes that the proposed Cove Point natural gas plant needs to be studied more and various state and federal agencies should weigh in ("Shipping LNG overseas is an ecological mistake," April 3).

Comments
Loading