Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99
News Opinion Readers Respond

Democrats get it wrong, again

Last Sunday's edition had a couple of topics that merit responses. JP Morgan Chase's record $13 billion tentative settlement with the U.S. Justice Department concerning the alleged misrepresentation of residential mortgage-backed securities begs the question, why did this take so long and why was this bank singled out while Goldman Sachs, which also sold such securities, was not? Could it be due to Goldman's close ties with the Obama administration?

With regard to the recession's cause being these risky sub prime mortgage-related financial instruments, columnist Robert L Ehrlich Jr. provided some timely insight, placing some of blame on regulators and politicians (Rep. Barney Frank being one example) which is all too forgotten or unacknowledged by the Democrats ("The real culprits of the housing crisis go unpunished,".

Unfortunately, when people in the government are culpable for contributing to the mess by trying to alter the dynamics of risk and reward via the pushing of sub prime mortgages, it is impossible to exact penalties for damages. That is the one-sided power of the government for you.

Meanwhile, a letter writer tries to pin the blame for the government shutdown on Rep. Andy Harris ("Harris voted against Maryland's economy"). The writer obviously does not know the facts. The House included in the budget they passed and sent to the U.S. Senate all the funds needed to keep the government open with the exception of funding for Obamacare. Withholding of funds is a constitutional prerogative of the House where budget bills originate. But Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid did not allow a vote on that bill (so we will never know whether our two Maryland senators would have voted to prevent the shutdown or not). By not allowing a vote in the Senate along with a threat of a presidential veto, Mr. Reid subrogated government workers, the military, veterans, national security and the economy for the sole purpose of protecting a sacred cow (another attempt to alter risk-reward dynamics — this time for the insurance industry).

So if you want to pin blame for the damage to Maryland's economy look to Mr. Reid and President Barack Obama.

Michael Vance Ernest Sr., Catonsville

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Ehrlich too negative, too partisan
    Ehrlich too negative, too partisan

    Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s cocky and aggressive partisanship make it evident why he couldn't govern effectively in Annapolis and was not re-elected for a second term ("Why Obama is viewed as weak," Nov. 30).

  • Ehrlich's delusions of grandeur
    Ehrlich's delusions of grandeur

    The Sun's front page recently carried the article, "Ehrlich entertains presidential hopes" (Dec. 3), yet it was not April 1. Surely, this was a joke. It's even more preposterous than Martin O'Malley running for president!

  • Ehrlich's 'cult of anti-Obamaism'
    Ehrlich's 'cult of anti-Obamaism'

    Though I am 1960s retread boomer and unrepentant liberal who usually disagrees commentator Robert L. Ehrlich Jr., I read his column regularly. No surprise that he recently panned Obamacare — again — but what I never hear from Republicans is the Plan B, i.e., how we deal with the...

  • Obamacare is a 'varsity stinker'
    Obamacare is a 'varsity stinker'

    OK, I can't help myself. Over the past three years, I have written at least a dozen columns critical of Obamacare (a.k.a. The "Affordable Care Act") in this space and devoted an entire chapter to the topic in my book "America: Hope for Change."

  • Hillary all over again
    Hillary all over again

    With the exception of President Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton is the most recognized American politician of this era. Today, she is far and away the Democratic front runner for president. Many believe she is the odds on favorite to win it all — a view supported by a variety of public...

  • What Obama should have said
    What Obama should have said

    Here is what President Barack Obama should have said when he addressed the American people after his party's massive losses in Tuesday's election:

  • Ehrlich mistaken on tax burden
    Ehrlich mistaken on tax burden

    Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. does not look at the big picture. Is this because he is not interested in giving a fair presentation? In his most recent column (tax bill for government at all levels.

  • Ehrlich gets the numbers wrong
    Ehrlich gets the numbers wrong

    I'm often perplexed by the content in Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s column and wonder if he is free from fact-checking because his words appear on the op-ed page. One particular paragraph in his column, "American values under Obama" (Nov. 2), left me even more confused than usual.

Comments
Loading