Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
NewsOpinionReaders Respond

A modest proposal for contraception coverage

Family PlanningAffordable Care Act (Obamacare)

If churches are so opposed to the Affordable Care Act's contraception coverage, they need to respond in the correct arena. Rather than appealing to government to change the law, they should man up and just fire their employees who take advantage of contraception coverage. They could require all employees to sign an affidavit declaring that they will not avail themselves of contraception while employed by the religious organization, under penalty of immediate dismissal. Let them worry about the lawsuits that will arise (it will be "good for jobs" in the legal sector). Or, let churches start paying taxes if they want the right to whine about secular law.

To my mind, universal contraception coverage on demand is far preferable to abortion, or worse, unwanted children, and far less costly.

Richard Caserta, Baltimore

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
Family PlanningAffordable Care Act (Obamacare)
  • Why is Mikulski trying to 'fix' the Supreme Court's decision? [Letter]
    Why is Mikulski trying to 'fix' the Supreme Court's decision? [Letter]

    On her website, Sen. Barbara Mikulski proclaims that she is joining other senators to introduce a "legislative fix to protect women's health" following the Supreme Court's recent decision in the Hobby Lobby case. Whether you are for abortion or against abortion, whether you think your...

  • Pushy pro-lifers [Letter]
    Pushy pro-lifers [Letter]

    Letter writer Mary Catalfamo claims that Planned Parenthood denies any pregnant women immediate, free access to the full spectrum of information and counseling ("Supreme Court decisions won't limit women's rights," July 9).

  • An effort to shame, cloaked in the guise of women's empowerment [Letter]
    An effort to shame, cloaked in the guise of women's empowerment [Letter]

    Regarding the recent rant by small business woman and political activist Michelle Jefferson ("Stop griping and get a grip, ladies," July 11), it seems that she missed the most basic and fundamental message of the women's movement in the last century: don't leave your sisters behind.

  • Global needs: food and birth control [Letter]
    Global needs: food and birth control [Letter]

    While writer Mike Gesker ("U.S. food aid still critical abroad," July 10) rightly affirms our commitment to sending food to poor countries, as a member of Catholic Relief Services he fails though to address the other side of this economic problem.

  • Misreporting the Hobby Lobby decision [Letter]
    Misreporting the Hobby Lobby decision [Letter]

    The Supreme Court decision in the Hobby Lobby case was confined specifically to exempting some employers from having to pay for medications or procedures that terminate a pregnancy after conception ("Court sides with employers in contraception case," June 30).

  • Hobby Lobby decision a case for Supreme Court term limits [Letter]
    Hobby Lobby decision a case for Supreme Court term limits [Letter]

    The inane Hobby Lobby decision clearly shows it is time to set term limits for the judges of the Supreme Court ("Corporations vs. people," June 30). It is time to get rid of Justice Antonin Scalia — the smuggest among the high court's nine, and Clarence Thomas — the dumbest,...

Comments
Loading