Summer Sale! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Contraceptives: The issue is religious liberty, not birth control

Regarding Susan Reimer's recent column: It's sad to say but , yes, women will remember ("Women will remember in November," March 12). Even more sad is that women have reacted to a disguised cause.

Women's health is not the real issue here. Why did President Obama choose to proclaim 100 percent coverage just for women's contraceptives? Why did he insist that the Catholic Church cover women's contraceptives? Why not cover 100 percent of all women's medications?

Many insurance companies already cover contraceptives. Covering the pill is probably a money-saver for them.

Sandra Fluke was protesting the lack of availability of insurance coverage that included contraceptives at a Catholic university. But all affiliates of the Catholic Church should be protected by the First Amendment's guarantee of religious freedom.

The women who Ms. Reimer says will remember in November are missing the point.

Marjorie L. Burkley, Bel Air

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • School birth control makes parents' jobs harder

    School birth control makes parents' jobs harder

    It is the parents' job to teach their children right from wrong. At the very least, schools should not be making the parents' job harder ("Amid teen pregnancy decline, debate renewed about birth control in schools," June 6).

  • Little Sisters' employees have rights, too

    Little Sisters' employees have rights, too

    The Founders wisely gave us the First Amendment so that the followers of one faith could not force others to live their lives according to that faith. They had already seen how religion could be the basis for so much suffering. The case of the Little Sisters of the Poor and the Affordable Care...

  • Teens have a right to birth control

    Teens have a right to birth control

    As two organizations committed to increasing access to reproductive health care services for all Marylanders, we were glad to see The Sun highlight the availability of contraceptives in school-based health clinics ("Amid teen pregnancy decline, debate renewed about birth control in schools," June...

  • Little Sisters treated shamefully

    Little Sisters treated shamefully

    President Barack Obama's federal government has scored another big win in its war on religion in the United States, which used to be a nation under God ("Federal court rules against Little Sisters of the Poor," July 15). We should be ashamed of our court system as well as this "government" pledged...

  • Pills don't prevent STDs

    Pills don't prevent STDs

    This letter is in response to Susan Reimer's column about the GOP's attitude about birth control ("On birth control, young Republicans get it," April 15). I think Ms. Reimer's opinion is very narrow-minded. While I agree that young people often have premarital sex with no desire to procreate, I...

  • Stokes, like many before him, is wrong on birth control

    Stokes, like many before him, is wrong on birth control

    Readers Diana Philip and Spencer Hall were right to call out City Councilman Carl Stokes for his characterization of teen access to contraceptives as "a racist policy targeting African-American youth" ("Teens have a right to birth control," June 11).

Comments
Loading
88°