Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

An armed society is a polite society [Letter]

Professor of genocide studies Samuel Totten writes drivel that is more puff piece than serious commentary ("Congress capitulates to the NRA," Jan. 28). For him, evidently feelings are king, while thought or science are just annoying facts that get in the way.

Most people at the site of the Columbia Mall shooting did not see the shooter or the shotgun he used. But almost everyone saw pistols, rifles, shotguns, assault rifles and other assorted weapons in hands, on hips, or strapped to a leg.

Were I a betting man the bet would be that everyone there saw a gun attached to someone that day. The someone was probably a law-abiding cop.

What the mall shooting proves is that the guns in hands of policemen are protecting policemen. They are not dummies. They want a chance to get home to their wives and kids and stay healthy enough to go to work tomorrow. It's the reason why cops have a gun.

The mall shooting taught me that an armed society is a polite society. Background checks are a waste of my money and a cop's time. Maryland spent millions on background checks. A great cop spends one solid year on background checks to make two arrests. Is that a great use of $100,000 in compensation?

Another thing that the mall shooting confirmed is that a bullet to the brain stopped the carnage just like it did in Newtown. The question of the day is how can our society deliver that medicine faster? I will take that AR-15 and a pistol on my hip just like the cops.

Bill Krehnbrink

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Maryland's gun law is working
    Maryland's gun law is working

    The gun lobby's lawsuit against Maryland's life-saving Firearm Safety Act described in Saturday's front page article does not challenge the constitutionality of the key provision of the act — requiring handgun purchasers to first obtain a fingerprint based background check and license...

  • Md. gun law is working [Letter]
    Md. gun law is working [Letter]

    Jack Mccauley's letter belittling the Firearms Safety Act fails to mention the most important parts of the new law — the requirement that handgun purchasers get a fingerprint-based license and the authority for the state police to regulate firearms dealers ("O'Malley, Brown are kidding...

  • Gun law doesn't make Marylanders safer [Letter]
    Gun law doesn't make Marylanders safer [Letter]

    Lt. Gov. Anthony Brown's recent commentary on Maryland's 2013 Firearms Safety Act is disingenuous and deceitful ("Brown: I will enforce gun safety law," Oct. 2).

  • A wasteful death by Uzi [Letter]

    Though I seriously doubt it, I wonder if a gun advocate or a member of National Rifle Association could explain to me why a 9-year-old girl needs weapons training ("An Uzi, a 9-year-old and American exceptionalism," Aug. 31). When I first read about the 9-year-old girl who had accidentally...

  • The city's problem isn't guns, it's gangs [Letter]
    The city's problem isn't guns, it's gangs [Letter]

    While I agree with letter writer Pat Ranney that Baltimore has a serious gun violence problem, she is incorrectly placing blame on an inanimate object. Guns don't pull the trigger, people do ("Baltimore's violence won't end until we stand up to the gun lobby," Aug. 14).

  • Judge's decision on Md. assault weapons ban makes no one safer [Letter]
    Judge's decision on Md. assault weapons ban makes no one safer [Letter]

    U.S. District Judge Catherine Blake's decision upholding Maryland's assault weapons ban isn't a victory for anyone ("A victory for public safety," Aug. 14).

Comments
Loading