Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

More research is needed on the Common Core standards [Letter]

As a long-time educator, I recognize the need for the Common Core State standards and strongly support them. However, as the standards have been rolled out in the public schools, some major concerns have been raised ("In defense of Common Core," June 27).

While I agree that the Common Core standards will raise student skills in all areas, my first concern is that the Common Core has not taken into account the developmental level of the child. The standards have been mapped backward to develop the skills that students will need when they graduate, yet they fail to take into account how students' brains grow.

For example, the skill of reading for meaning relies on a part of the brain that is not developed in children until the fourth or fifth grade. Yet the standards expect them to be developed in the earlier grades. In algebra, the skills kindergarten students are now expected to have tap into abstract thinking patterns that don't develop in most kids until later years.

Students need to master many preliminary skills before they can develop the higher-order ones. The preliminary skills are what are currently developed in the primary grades. While the potential to develop certain parts of the brain earlier sounds awesome, students would feel the extra stress and teachers would need more influence over their preschool education to develop those skills earlier.

Many students come to class without having the benefit of parents who read to them or helped them learn numbers and letters, so teachers need to fill in those gaps as well. The political movement to develop pre-school skills earlier is a step in the right direction. However, until brain researchers can find ways to develop the human brain faster, students and teachers will struggle.

You also failed to mention that the standards have been rolled out without being tested for validity and reliability. That means that they have not been tested enough to determine if they really bring the results that are needed.

To solve the issue of different interpretations of the standards, textbook and testing companies have jumped on board to create curriculum and assessment materials that supposedly match up with the standards. This means that they plan on making money off the standards and our kids. Is that how we want the Common Core standards delivered — by corporate entities?

I agree that a roll out of the Common Core should be done gradually, preferably one grade level at a time. However, before that happens more research needs to be done. If we want students and teachers to be held accountable, shouldn't we hold the materials they will be measured by accountable as well?

Barbara Boksz

To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • What the Common Core is and isn't [Commentary]
    What the Common Core is and isn't [Commentary]

    Surveys show a disconnect in the public's understanding of new standards for instruction adopted across the nation, Howard superintendent says

  • Let's provide opt-out on PARCC
    Let's provide opt-out on PARCC

    The term, "limousine liberal" was coined in the early 1970s to underscore the hypocrisy of families like the Kennedys who sent their children to private schools of their choosing while the school of choice for ordinary Americans was left to the state and a quota system.

  • Online testing another example of misplaced priorities
    Online testing another example of misplaced priorities

    After reading Liz Bowie's piece on Dec. 26 ("Md. schools move toward testing via computers"), it appears Maryland is now a prime example of how the runaway costs of assessments are spiraling out of control. In yet another illustration of the "build the plane as we fly it" insanity, school systems...

  • Common Core blows up testing [Letter]
    Common Core blows up testing [Letter]

    State officials deeply vested in new Common Core curriculum mandates and tests want us to believe that marked student declines on state tests since Common Core moved into place aren't Common Core's fault ("MSA warning signs," July 14). Even though Common Core is supposed to be more difficult than...

  • Curriculum changes deserve failing grade [Letter]
    Curriculum changes deserve failing grade [Letter]

    I think the new curriculum is not good at all ("MSA warning signs," July 15). As a country, we focus more on test and test scores than we actually do on teaching these kids. The old ways of doing things were better and way more effective.

  • Defending a defense of Common Core [Letter]
    Defending a defense of Common Core [Letter]

    Thank you for an intelligent explanation of the theories behind the Common Core standards ("In defense of Common Core," June 27). You detailed the purpose behind the English and math standards with examples that should make sense to most people. Rather than move students through grades with a minimum...

  • Sun doesn't understand Common Core [Letter]
    Sun doesn't understand Common Core [Letter]

    The "new higher standards" that The Sun's editorial board has just discovered as it defends the Common Core are of great interest to those who were responsible for the learning program of students for the past 50 years ("In defense of Common Core," June 27). It is also an incredible insult to those...

  • In defense of Common Core [Editorial]
    In defense of Common Core [Editorial]

    Our view: Higher standards will push Maryland schools to the next level; the state needs to do whatever it takes to help local districts make the transition as seamless as possible