Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

More research is needed on the Common Core standards [Letter]

As a long-time educator, I recognize the need for the Common Core State standards and strongly support them. However, as the standards have been rolled out in the public schools, some major concerns have been raised ("In defense of Common Core," June 27).

While I agree that the Common Core standards will raise student skills in all areas, my first concern is that the Common Core has not taken into account the developmental level of the child. The standards have been mapped backward to develop the skills that students will need when they graduate, yet they fail to take into account how students' brains grow.

For example, the skill of reading for meaning relies on a part of the brain that is not developed in children until the fourth or fifth grade. Yet the standards expect them to be developed in the earlier grades. In algebra, the skills kindergarten students are now expected to have tap into abstract thinking patterns that don't develop in most kids until later years.

Students need to master many preliminary skills before they can develop the higher-order ones. The preliminary skills are what are currently developed in the primary grades. While the potential to develop certain parts of the brain earlier sounds awesome, students would feel the extra stress and teachers would need more influence over their preschool education to develop those skills earlier.

Many students come to class without having the benefit of parents who read to them or helped them learn numbers and letters, so teachers need to fill in those gaps as well. The political movement to develop pre-school skills earlier is a step in the right direction. However, until brain researchers can find ways to develop the human brain faster, students and teachers will struggle.

You also failed to mention that the standards have been rolled out without being tested for validity and reliability. That means that they have not been tested enough to determine if they really bring the results that are needed.

To solve the issue of different interpretations of the standards, textbook and testing companies have jumped on board to create curriculum and assessment materials that supposedly match up with the standards. This means that they plan on making money off the standards and our kids. Is that how we want the Common Core standards delivered — by corporate entities?

I agree that a roll out of the Common Core should be done gradually, preferably one grade level at a time. However, before that happens more research needs to be done. If we want students and teachers to be held accountable, shouldn't we hold the materials they will be measured by accountable as well?

Barbara Boksz

To respond to this letter, send an email to Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • No to Common Core and corporate classrooms

    No to Common Core and corporate classrooms

    After reading The Sun's editorial, "Ready for kindergarten?" (May 24), I didn't know whether to laugh or cry at the absurdity of the editorial board's take on the Common Core and their belief that more vigorous testing and even earlier intervention is the answer to student success down the road.

  • Online testing another example of misplaced priorities

    Online testing another example of misplaced priorities

    After reading Liz Bowie's piece on Dec. 26 ("Md. schools move toward testing via computers"), it appears Maryland is now a prime example of how the runaway costs of assessments are spiraling out of control. In yet another illustration of the "build the plane as we fly it" insanity, school systems...

  • Let's provide opt-out on PARCC

    Let's provide opt-out on PARCC

    The term, "limousine liberal" was coined in the early 1970s to underscore the hypocrisy of families like the Kennedys who sent their children to private schools of their choosing while the school of choice for ordinary Americans was left to the state and a quota system.

  • What the Common Core is and isn't [Commentary]

    What the Common Core is and isn't [Commentary]

    Surveys show a disconnect in the public's understanding of new standards for instruction adopted across the nation, Howard superintendent says

  • School reform needs reform

    School reform needs reform

    It's time to put the narrative to rest: teachers are not lazy, incompetent, uncaring union thugs who need to be monitored by lengthy student testing and supplanted by devices. This tired, poorly drawn image brought to you by the so-called education reformers is falling to the truth, and public...

  • Ready for Kindergarten?

    Ready for Kindergarten?

    Even Maryland's youngest students are feeling the effect of the state's switch to the more rigorous academic requirements of the Common Core standards. This week state officials reported that fewer than half the state's 4- and 5-year-olds are "fully ready" to succeed when they enter Kindergarten,...

  • Reforms shortchange teachers

    Reforms shortchange teachers

    Kudos and thanks to Bonnie Bricker for her years of service and astute observations concerning school "reform" from the front line trenches as a teacher ("School reform needs reform," June 2).

  • The Common Core can't speed up child development

    The Common Core can't speed up child development

    Recent evaluations of the state's preschoolers have determined that only 47 percent are ready for kindergarten, compared to 83 percent judged ready last year. This drastic drop isn't the result of an abrupt, catastrophic decline in the cognitive abilities of our children. Instead it results from...