Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

The Common Core should have come with a curriculum

All the problems created with counties scrambling to create curriculum to match the Common Core standards leaves me wondering why the creators of those standards did not write a curriculum to go with them in the first place ("What is expected of students under Common Core," Oct. 9).

At the very least it seems wasteful to have hundreds of counties across the nation spending time and resources doing the same thing. At the national level there would certainly be more resources to do a better job.

Counties would have the option of adopting the national curriculum as written or refining it at their discretion. More importantly, a national curriculum released in a timely manner would give teachers the opportunity to become familiar with the material and prepare themselves for what they are going to teach before they step into the classroom that first day.

James W. Apgar, Catonsville

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • What the Common Core is and isn't [Commentary]
    What the Common Core is and isn't [Commentary]

    Surveys show a disconnect in the public's understanding of new standards for instruction adopted across the nation, Howard superintendent says

  • Common Core blows up testing [Letter]
    Common Core blows up testing [Letter]

    State officials deeply vested in new Common Core curriculum mandates and tests want us to believe that marked student declines on state tests since Common Core moved into place aren't Common Core's fault ("MSA warning signs," July 14). Even though Common Core is supposed to be more difficult...

  • Curriculum changes deserve failing grade [Letter]
    Curriculum changes deserve failing grade [Letter]

    I think the new curriculum is not good at all ("MSA warning signs," July 15). As a country, we focus more on test and test scores than we actually do on teaching these kids. The old ways of doing things were better and way more effective.

  • Defending a defense of Common Core [Letter]
    Defending a defense of Common Core [Letter]

    Thank you for an intelligent explanation of the theories behind the Common Core standards ("In defense of Common Core," June 27). You detailed the purpose behind the English and math standards with examples that should make sense to most people. Rather than move students through grades with a...

  • Sun doesn't understand Common Core [Letter]
    Sun doesn't understand Common Core [Letter]

    The "new higher standards" that The Sun's editorial board has just discovered as it defends the Common Core are of great interest to those who were responsible for the learning program of students for the past 50 years ("In defense of Common Core," June 27). It is also an incredible insult to...

  • More research is needed on the Common Core standards [Letter]
    More research is needed on the Common Core standards [Letter]

    As a long-time educator, I recognize the need for the Common Core State standards and strongly support them. However, as the standards have been rolled out in the public schools, some major concerns have been raised ("In defense of Common Core," June 27).

  • In defense of Common Core [Editorial]
    In defense of Common Core [Editorial]

    Our view: Higher standards will push Maryland schools to the next level; the state needs to do whatever it takes to help local districts make the transition as seamless as possible

  • Why 'unprepared' teachers quit [Letter]
    Why 'unprepared' teachers quit [Letter]

    It seems to me that additional certification requirements added through the past years should have addressed the issues of teacher preparedness addressed in the op-ed "Zero tolerance for unprepared teachers" (June 25). The increase in unsuccessful teachers who struggle and then leave the...

Comments
Loading