Get unlimited digital access to baltimoresun.com. $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

College athletes should not be paid

In "A new day for athletes" (Oct. 30), Paul Marx demonstrates an embarrassing lack of knowledge and research about his subject. The graduation rate by 2011 for all freshmen entering at all U.S. colleges and universities in 2005 was 59 percent, 61 percent for women and 56 percent for men. Meanwhile, "[a]ccording to the most recent Graduation Success Rate data 82 percent of Division I freshmen scholarship student-athletes who entered college in 2004 earned a degree. In Division II, 73 percent of freshmen student-athletes who entered college in 2004 graduated. The graduation rate data are based on a six-year cohort prescribed by the U.S. Department of Education."

Yes, a small percentage student athletes are admitted as "exceptional admits." But these numbers speak to the success of standards that indicate a high probability of success and the tutoring programs that exist in today's programs, not unlike programs in place for many high potential, non-athletes admitted to every institution.

While Mr. Marx was attending every home game at Michigan and Iowa, I was playing Division I football at one of the other Big Ten institutions with an annual graduation success rate in the top 10 percent nationally at 85 percent. While he was teaching English, I spent the early years of my career as an assistant dean at a large East Coast state university. Of the 800 living football lettermen from my alma mater who listed a career, the most common professions indicated enormous success. Some 15 percent played professional football as a first career, but 15 percent were corporate executives, 13 percent were K-12 educators, 13 percent were corporate sales executives, and 10 percent were professionals (doctors, lawyers, dentists, financial services, etc.).

I think contemporary college football players are still motivated by winning the game and earning opportunities to play at the next level. Like us, I seriously doubt that players in at least 100 of the Division I schools even know how much their coaches earn. And I would bet those who do see the high salaries as an institutional investment in their success as players.

In the 1960s when Mr. Marx was presumably warming a bleacher in the Big House, the NCAA scholarship cap provided for tuition, room, board, books and $15 per month "laundry money," period. Fifty years later, with 50-week football programs, no opportunities for summer employment and players predominantly from poorer families, the cap has not changed at $15, period. And scholarship student athletes do not qualify for any additional forms of aid, leaving their parents to sacrifice to subsidize their education.

For those of you who want to cheer for paid college athletes, contact Mr. Marx for more information on Michigan and Iowa. Or better yet, buy Orioles or Ravens tickets. For those of us who want to cheer for student athletes, 85 percent of whom graduate and two-thirds of whom become professional and community leaders, yes, speak up for a fairer allowances but stay true to the principles of the self discipline and dual success of those who actually pay a huge price to represent and succeed in your favorite institution of higher education.

Warren Hartenstine, Havre de Grace

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Athlete's new day
    Athlete's new day

    College football players need pay for play, often over classes

  • Obamacare has raised costs
    Obamacare has raised costs

    I read with interest the news regarding the increased cost of drugs for those who have signed on with the Affordable Care Act. I am one of those who went from a co-pay of zero to a monthly cost of $299.62 for medication to control a chronic illness, ulcerative colitis. There is no cure and...

  • On environment, Hogan should be like his dad
    On environment, Hogan should be like his dad

    Dan Rodricks reminds us that care for the environment used to be a bipartisan affair ("Hogan missed dad's lesson on pollution," Jan. 27). At his inauguration, Maryland's new governor rightly praised his former-Congressman father (Lawrence J. Hogan Sr.) for teaching him "more about integrity...

  • Md. leaders must stand up for the bay
    Md. leaders must stand up for the bay

    As an out-of-state University of Maryland student, family and friends back home like to ask if I've tried crabs or oysters, foods that come from the Chesapeake Bay.

  • Implosion of blast furnace ends an era
    Implosion of blast furnace ends an era

    The Star of Bethlehem has been removed from the L Blast Furnace, and its fate is uncertain ("Sparrows Pt. furnace imploded," Jan. 29). I remember driving to work on those dark, cold winter mornings before sunrise and the star would come into view atop the furnace. The radio would crackle with...

  • What would The Sun cut from the state budget?
    What would The Sun cut from the state budget?

    Predictably, The Sun continues to lambaste Gov. Larry Hogan on nearly every cut he has proposed in his budget, while mostly agreeing that cuts have to be made in order to balance Maryland's out of control spending ("Baltimore's progress at risk," Jan. 29). Perhaps the almighty and all-knowing...

  • Hogan shows he's just a typical politician
    Hogan shows he's just a typical politician

    Cutting funding for Baltimore city schools. Cutting funding for Montgomery County and Prince George's County schools. Cutting funding for Medicaid providers. These are related to constituencies that did not support Mr. Hogan in the election. Coincidence? This is indeed a depressing beginning to...

  • Hogan cuts to worker salaries are unwise
    Hogan cuts to worker salaries are unwise

    Your article highlighting the cuts proposed by Gov. Larry Hogan in his first budget ("Hogan plan would cut budgets for years to come," Jan. 26) shows a rather meager attempt to "Change Maryland" for the better — a campaign promise he continued to trumpet throughout his inaugural address.

Comments
Loading