Get unlimited digital access to baltimoresun.com. $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Thomas dead-wrong on climate [Letter]

Cal Thomas' column on "Chicken Little science" (April 19) on baltimoresun.com contains so much inaccurate deception that it's hard to know where to start.

In dismissing the seriousness and urgency of the climate change challenge, he places his faith on one economist who withdrew from the 309 scientists who wrote the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change impacts report. He is also willing to trust one physicist who did research on climate in the late 1970s rather than 235 still active scientists who wrote the IPCC physical science report. His assertions about the rate of sea-level rise declining are dead wrong. Just go to Colorado University's sea level website and you will see for yourself the actual satellite data that no slow-down in the rate of rise for the past 10-year period. In fact, the sea-level rise experienced has been slightly higher than earlier climate models had forecast.

After such a fine editorial calling for action on climate change the day earlier ("Climate change demands action", why would The Sun publish such nonsense?

Donald F. Boesch, Cambridge

The writer is president of the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science.

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Protecting Alaskan wilderness
    Protecting Alaskan wilderness

    Based on the reactions of Alaska Republicans, one might think that President Barack Obama had decided to unilaterally ban guns and snowmobiles from the 49th state instead of merely proposing to upgrade the protected status for certain federally-owned land from "national wildlife refuge" to...

  • Time to act on climate change
    Time to act on climate change

    The UN-sponsored Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change recently warned that we must drastically reduce our dependence on fossil fuels if we are to avoid irreparable damage to the planet.

  • Coping with climate change
    Coping with climate change

    A recent letter to the editor points out that a solution to climate change is available that could be supported by Republicans ("Carbon fee is bipartisan solution to climate change," Jan 22).

  • Stricter ozone standards would be disastrous for the economy
    Stricter ozone standards would be disastrous for the economy

    Your editorial on ozone regulations suggests we would have no national ozone standards at all without the EPA's onerous new regulations ("Holding one's breath, GOP style," Dec. 8). Not true. The current ozone standards of 75 parts per billion (ppb) are the most stringent in history. Issued in...

  • Md. bucks national trend toward solar energy
    Md. bucks national trend toward solar energy

    As a Baltimore resident I am embarrassed that Maryland hasn't taken more aggressive steps to harvest renewable resources like solar energy.

  • Carbon fee is bipartisan solution to climate change
    Carbon fee is bipartisan solution to climate change

    Missing from John Fritze's summary of President Barack Obama's State of the Union address ("Obama turns populist in State of the Union speech," Jan. 21) are his comments on the greatest threat to future generations — climate change. I applaud President Obama for bringing up this difficult...

  • City smog threatens our health and the economy
    City smog threatens our health and the economy

    The EPA's recent decision to tighten limits on smog pollution is commendable and necessary ("Holding one's breath, GOP style," Dec. 8).

  • Obama as environmentalist
    Obama as environmentalist

    I'm glad reporter John Fritze pointed out President Barack Obama's interest in shaping the political agenda during his State of the Union Address ("Obama sounds populist themes in State of the Union," Jan. 20).

Comments
Loading