Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99
News Opinion Readers Respond

Fighting climate change makes economic sense [Letter]

Thank you for highlighting the most important finding of the recent Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change report: "addressing climate change appears to be cheaper than doing nothing" ("Climate change demands action," April 19).

Just as the vast majority of scientists agree that climate change is happening, it is caused by humans, and we need to urgently act to avoid the worst effects, so too do the vast majority of economists concur that a revenue-neutral carbon tax is the best option for reducing our greenhouse gas emissions. This majority includes many respected and conservative-leaning economists such as George Shultz, Art Laffer, Greg Mankiw, and Douglas Holtz-Eakin (all economists serving under President Ronald Reagan, President George H.W. Bush, or Republican Presidential candidates Mitt Romney and John McCain).

With this amount of consensus, why do we not have such a policy in place already? Our elected officials do not believe the American public wants them to act on this issue. Members of Congress do not create political will, they respond to it. Readers should please write to their representatives and senators asking them to pass a revenue-neutral carbon tax. If they hear from enough of us, they will be compelled to act. It is a small task we can all do in celebration of Earth Day.

Ashley Hunt-Martorano, Medford N.Y.

The writer is volunteer co-leader of the Citizens Climate Lobby Long Island.

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Last gasp for climate change denial?
    Last gasp for climate change denial?

    Editor's note: This editorial has been updated to reflect that Resources for the Future is not a part of Stanford University. The Sun regrets the error. 

  • Protecting Alaskan wilderness
    Protecting Alaskan wilderness

    Based on the reactions of Alaska Republicans, one might think that President Barack Obama had decided to unilaterally ban guns and snowmobiles from the 49th state instead of merely proposing to upgrade the protected status for certain federally-owned land from "national wildlife refuge" to...

  • Md. bucks national trend toward solar energy
    Md. bucks national trend toward solar energy

    As a Baltimore resident I am embarrassed that Maryland hasn't taken more aggressive steps to harvest renewable resources like solar energy.

  • Coping with climate change
    Coping with climate change

    A recent letter to the editor points out that a solution to climate change is available that could be supported by Republicans ("Carbon fee is bipartisan solution to climate change," Jan 22).

  • Obama as environmentalist
    Obama as environmentalist

    I'm glad reporter John Fritze pointed out President Barack Obama's interest in shaping the political agenda during his State of the Union Address ("Obama sounds populist themes in State of the Union," Jan. 20).

  • Carbon fee is bipartisan solution to climate change
    Carbon fee is bipartisan solution to climate change

    Missing from John Fritze's summary of President Barack Obama's State of the Union address ("Obama turns populist in State of the Union speech," Jan. 21) are his comments on the greatest threat to future generations — climate change. I applaud President Obama for bringing up this difficult...

Comments
Loading