Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Ignoring climate change science isn't smart

Richard Haddad's anti-science screed ("Get past alarmism on global warming," Oct. 26) reminds me uncannily of the previous White House's readiness to disregard well-grounded warnings from their political opponents, as when Bush administration officials treated the briefings they'd received from Clinton staffers about Osama Bin Laden and al-Qaida as unwarranted alarmism. Sept. 11, of course, brought us the infamous Cheney doctrine: Even a 1 percent chance that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction was sufficient reason to mount a military offensive.

Notice that beforehand, justified warnings were dismissed, and afterward, no evidence was required to justify action.

Mr. Haddad needs to hear a few plain facts. The earth is, in fact, getting hotter and the scientific consensus on human causes of global warming is exceptionally strong. The "climategate" scandal has been repeatedly debunked and the economic consequences of shifting to renewable energy are overwhelmingly positive.

When scientific expertise is politicized by conservatives who prefer to deny inconvenient facts, our country and the world are the losers.

Warren Senders, Medford, Mass.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Climate change and national security

    Climate change and national security

    Your editorial "The danger of climate denial" (May 22) offered a dismal forecast, yet some people continue to deny that climate change is real or that it is caused at least in part by human activity.

  • Obama's words and actions at odds

    Obama's words and actions at odds

    Your editorial on President Barack Obama's speech at the Coast Guard Academy graduation ceremony rightly commended him for his straightforward discussion of climate change ("The danger of climate denial," May 22).

  • GDP must consider environmental costs

    GDP must consider environmental costs

    The Sun's recent editorial about the GOP's intention to gut the EPA's authority to regulate carbon dioxide emissions touches on an important economic issue ("Holding one's breath, GOP-style," Dec. 9).

  • Is Obama overly ambitious on ozone regulations?

    Is Obama overly ambitious on ozone regulations?

    President Barack Obama has a narrowing window to secure a legacy in which he can take pride and which historians will applaud and note with favor. Freed from having to run for office ever again, President Obama can focus on his legacy, work to ensure that a Democrat succeeds him in the White House...

  • Smog limits are badly needed

    Smog limits are badly needed

    Maryland has the worst air on the East Coast and highest premature death rate in the nation. National Academy of Sciences data suggest that health impacts resulting from fossil fuels cost $73 per household per month in Maryland and are a drag on the economy. Yet conservative deniers and their self-serving,...

  • A healthier way to fly

    A healthier way to fly

    Last week, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency took the first step toward reducing greenhouse gas emissions from airplanes. The rule-making process will take months if not years, but the lingering question is, how will the proposed regulations fit with what other countries are doing about...

  • City smog threatens our health and the economy

    City smog threatens our health and the economy

    The EPA's recent decision to tighten limits on smog pollution is commendable and necessary ("Holding one's breath, GOP style," Dec. 8).

  • Forget hurricanes, the real threat to Md. is the rising sea level

    Forget hurricanes, the real threat to Md. is the rising sea level

    Your editorial "Don't take hurricanes lightly" (June 7) noted the threat hurricanes pose to Maryland, but the oceans hold much deadlier and persistent danger: Sea level rise.

Comments
Loading
72°