Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Wrong prescription for civil justice

The commentary by James R. Maxeiner ("The fixable flaws of U.S. civil justice," June 24), insofar as it applies to Maryland, displays a lamentable lack of familiarity with the operation of our court system. The contention that a lawsuit where the damages are $100,000 is "too small" to be handled by the courts is simply inaccurate. And to contend that the fees for such a recovery would consume 75 percent of such amount is at odds with prevailing standards.

The proposal that parties meet with judges at the outset of litigation is unrealistic for many reasons, not the least of which the time devoted to such an effort by busy judges would be greatly disproportionate to any perceived benefit. Professor Maxeiner disparages the discovery procedures which exist in both the state and federal systems, and are subject to detailed regulation. More importantly, the results, in the vast majority of cases, provide the parties with information essential to development of the case, often facts not even known to an opposing party.

Completely ignored in the criticism are the procedures developed by the courts for disposal of cases short of trial. A party may move for summary judgment where it becomes apparent that no viable cause of action exists, most often after discovery. Widespread mediation is ordered by the courts in a vast number of cases, and settlement conferences before trial, at all levels, have resulted in the reduction of a significant number of cases that actually go to trial. The suggestion that the large majority of cases should actually be tried would result in the creation of huge backlogs, given the vast number of cases filed each year in our society.

Disregarded also is the existence of our two tier trial court system, where cases involving more modest damages, or less complicated issues, are resolved promptly and in significant numbers. The proposal for adoption of a system for an assessments of costs, including attorneys' fees, against the losing party is contrary to the long-standing practice in American courts. The specter of possibly having to pay substantial costs in the event of losing would preclude many from even attempting to resolve their disputes through the courts. In short, the critique falls short of any meaningful discussion of the effectiveness of our courts due to the apparent unfamiliarity with their day-to-day operation.

Lastly, the suggestion that deciding lawsuits is simply applying the law reveals a surprising lack of awareness of the history of the issues confronted by our courts in response to ever-changing economic and social conditions. Landmark decisions throughout the history of our country have provided society with answers to complex problems and benefited all of us in diverse ways.

Marvin I. Singer and Marvin H. Schein

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Preakness and Pimlico are inseparable

    Preakness and Pimlico are inseparable

    Although it may be true that the Pimlico race track needs an update, the Preakness should never leave Baltimore ("Is sun setting on Preakness at Pimlico?" May 17).

  • School money could make a difference

    School money could make a difference

    They're killing Baltimore. No, I am not talking about all the senseless shootings and murders that have occurred since the beginning of the year, nor am I talking about the death of Freddie Gray and the riots that followed.

  • How women entrepreneurs can help rebuild Baltimore

    How women entrepreneurs can help rebuild Baltimore

    As The Sun's Natalie Sherman correctly pointed out ("Selling Baltimore after the rioting," May 16), increasing investment prospects is critical to the growth of Baltimore's business community. Historically, women entrepreneurs have had and will continue to have a significant impact on the local...

  • Parallel parking will soon be a lost art

    Parallel parking will soon be a lost art

    The MVA's decision to drop parallel parking from its driving exam promises nothing good ("Md. driver's test no longer includes parallel parking," May 20).

  • Yes, the rioters were thugs

    Yes, the rioters were thugs

    Writer Lia Purpuna's reflections on the unrest triggered by the death of Freddie Gray while in police custody were sophomoric, inaccurate and selectively incomplete ("Baltimore writers reflect on Freddie Gray's death," May 16).

  • Watch out for drunk drivers this weekend

    Watch out for drunk drivers this weekend

    While The Baltimore Sun is helping to usher in a celebrated time of year otherwise known as summer ("Memorial Day weekend travel projected to be busiest in a decade," May 20), the next three months are also a dangerous time of year when it comes to highway safety.

Comments
Loading

81°