Get unlimited digital access to $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Chicken companies shouldn't 'own' their farmers' manure

As an Eastern Shore chicken grower, like most others chicken growers and farmers, I was pleased to read recently in The Baltimore Sun of a study that indicates that after years of work, progress is being made in reducing the size and duration of Chesapeake Bay dead zones. Much of this success is due to improvements in farming techniques.

Experts have said for years that non-point source pollution reduction practices such as we use on farms would take years or decades to show results. Unlike immediately effective practices installed on sewage treatment plants and factories, farm practices never were expected to show immediate improvements. Now, the waiting is over and good things are resulting and more progress will be seen.

I want to take exception to one statement in that same Nov. 7 editorial "Chesapeake Bay: Hope and hurdles." The Baltimore Sun believes chicken companies should own the manure. Most chicken growers disagree with that because the manure, a locally produced organic fertilizer, has value to chicken growers who are selling it for up to $25 per ton. It is an important part of a farm's income. Additionally, crop farmers who use chicken manure as an organic fertilizer, including many chicken growers, are getting $92 worth of nutrients per ton. So it saves them money when they apply it to their land using state reviewed, state sanctioned nutrient management plans. Also, it increases the organic material in the soil and improves the soil's water holding capacity. Although some people call it a waste product, nothing could be further from the truth.

Our chicken companies are working hard on bay improvement programs. Making the chicken companies the owners of the manure will rob growers of a valuable commodity and do nothing to improve Chesapeake Bay water quality.

Andrew McLean, Centreville

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Md. needs more clean energy
    Md. needs more clean energy

    Maryland currently ranks fifth in the nation for worst air quality and produces over 60 percent of its energy from dirty sources like coal and natural gas. Immediately after his inauguration, Gov. Larry Hogan rolled back coal regulations that would have greatly improved air quality conditions...

  • Keystone veto was in U.S. interest
    Keystone veto was in U.S. interest

    The purpose of the Keystone XL pipeline is to make it easier for Canada to export some of filthiest crude oil on the planet — not to the U.S. (we don't need it) but to other countries.

  • Another drug abuse study waiting to be ignored
    Another drug abuse study waiting to be ignored

    I find it amusing that the Hogan administration is proposing a "study" to combat heroin addiction in Maryland ("The new face of Md.'s fight against heroin," Feb. 26).

  • Why can't Coke and Pepsi back a water tax repeal?
    Why can't Coke and Pepsi back a water tax repeal?

    Robi Rawl's commentary, "Repeal water tax" (Feb. 23), was a pithy pitch for making water more prominent in our lives, especially given the harm caused by sugary drink consumption.

  • Standardized tests didn't help me learn
    Standardized tests didn't help me learn

    I am a senior at Dulaney High School and write with a special note of concern toward the average testing of 8th grade children ("Debate rages over how many hours Maryland students should be tested each year," Nov. 15).

  • Cold, hard facts about infrastructure
    Cold, hard facts about infrastructure

    We can now add bursting residential water pipes and thousands of homes without water to ruptured water mains and traffic jams, to chunks of concrete crashing down from slowly collapsing bridges and to the other proof that our infrastructure is falling apart ("Residents' frustration mounts...