Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Chesapeake Bay, the rain tax and the faith community

In Kevin Philpy's recent commentary ("Taking care of God's Chesapeake Bay," June 19), he laid out the faith basis for stormwater fees and the responsibilities congregations share with fellow neighbors and landowners to clean up pollution generated by our parking lots, roofs and other impervious surfaces. In addition to the national faith groups Mr. Philpy named who are dedicated to caring for the earth, we would like to add ours, Interfaith Partners for the Chesapeake (IPC).

IPC is a Chesapeake Bay watershed-wide nonprofit that helps faith communities become better stewards of all natural life systems within the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Through our partnerships with congregations and faith leaders of many denominations, we help our religious communities articulate and embrace the theological imperative for tending to the earth. This includes helping our faith institutions navigate our responsibilities as landowners within the watershed.

Jodi Rose, Annapolis

The writer is interim director for Interfaith Partners for the Chesapeake (formerly Chesapeake Covenant Community).

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Holding the line on stormwater fees
    Holding the line on stormwater fees

    A House of Delegates committee was right last week to reject Gov. Larry Hogan's plan to repeal the so-called "rain tax," and a brewing debate in Anne Arundel County shows why.

  • Sun ignores real cost of 'rain tax'
    Sun ignores real cost of 'rain tax'

    As usual, The Sun gets it wrong on the real cost to homeowners of the "rain tax" ("The bogus 'rain tax' repeal," Nov. 24). According to the Sun's editorial board, the tax only costs about $39 a year for the typical Baltimore County homeowner. No big deal, right? Well, how about the residual costs...

  • The bogus 'rain tax' repeal
    The bogus 'rain tax' repeal

    Despite facing a bigger-than-expected budget shortfall, and although he promised a policy blackout until he takes office, Governor-elect Larry Hogan last week publicly reiterated his support for repealing Maryland's "rain tax" while meeting with fellow Republican governors in Florida. He told The...

  • Rain tax still isn't justified
    Rain tax still isn't justified

    Regarding The Sun's editorial on the stormwater management fee ("Carroll talks sense on stormwater," April 3), let's first explain Gov. Larry Hogan's position in my opinion. He proposed to get rid of the "rain tax," the legislature voted that down and proposed their own biased solution as offered...

  • On 'rain tax,' Hogan has the right idea
    On 'rain tax,' Hogan has the right idea

    The Sun really doesn't get it! Larry Hogan is "repealing" the "rain tax" because it is emblematic of the over-taxing of our state's residents ("The bogus 'rain tax' repeal," Nov. 24). You can engage in all the legalistic finger-wagging you care to, but the people of this state are not impressed...

  • 'Rain tax' not optional
    'Rain tax' not optional

    The recent sub-headline on the editorial regarding the "rain tax" was patently false ("The bogus 'rain tax' repeal," Nov. 23).

  • Time to flush the 'rain tax'
    Time to flush the 'rain tax'

    The Baltimore Sun editorial ("Bogus rain tax repeal," Nov. 24) neglects to mention that in passing the House Bill 987 Stormwater Management-Watershed and Restoration Program, the "rain tax" in response to the 2010 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency mandate aimed at reducing the pollution levels...

  • 'Rain tax' a drop in Md. tax bucket
    'Rain tax' a drop in Md. tax bucket

    I agree that the repeal of the "rain tax" is bogus ("The bogus 'rain tax' repeal," Nov. 24). But it would be interesting if The Sun put a table in the paper with the typical cost to Maryland residents of all the 40 or so new or increased taxes imposed upon us by the nanny Gov. Martin O'Malley.

Comments
Loading

63°