Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Contraceptives rule: A clear affront to the First Amendment

Judging from all the articles in The Sun recently, Sen. Barbara Mikulski, columnist Dan Rodricks and many others are wondering what all the fuss is about regarding the Catholic Church's strong opposition to requiring hospitals and schools to offer health insurance plans that provide contraceptives at no charge. They are missing the point.

The issue is not this particular type ofwomen's healthservices. In fact, as Mr. Rodricks stated correctly, many practicing Catholics disagree with the Church's opinion on birth control. The flash point is the government's intrusion into matters of conscience — a clear affront to the First Amendment, regardless of the particulars involved.

Until now, I have been proud of my government's stance on protecting and extending religious and human rights. This is the first time I have witnessed a reversal and removal of a right — and the first time I actually fear my government for setting such a precedent.

I know I'm not alone. Surely the Church and the administration can reach a reasonable compromise.

I have voted Democratic most of my life, sensing it to be the "party of protection." But this is a game-changer. Much as I abhor the thought of a Romney White House, many people like me would consider that now.

Clark Brill

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • On birth control, young Republicans get it

    On birth control, young Republicans get it

    Two-thirds of young Republicans believe that every woman should have access to affordable birth control, 65 percent believe that insurance companies should cover contraception without co-pays and 51 percent believe that the federal government should continue to fund contraceptive services for low-income...

  • Where OB-GYNs stand on over the counter birth control [Letter]

    Where OB-GYNs stand on over the counter birth control [Letter]

    A recent exchange within your opinion pages debated the benefit of over-the-counter access to oral contraceptives, with a letter to the editor ("Sun wrong on OTC birth control," Sept. 16) citing the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists as being supportive of recent proposals from...

  • Pills don't prevent STDs

    Pills don't prevent STDs

    This letter is in response to Susan Reimer's column about the GOP's attitude about birth control ("On birth control, young Republicans get it," April 15). I think Ms. Reimer's opinion is very narrow-minded. While I agree that young people often have premarital sex with no desire to procreate, I...

  • Birth control bait-and-switch [Editorial]

    Birth control bait-and-switch [Editorial]

    Our view: GOP candidates are touting their newfound support for expanded access to contraceptives, but the ploy could backfire

  • Why is Mikulski trying to 'fix' the Supreme Court's decision? [Letter]

    Why is Mikulski trying to 'fix' the Supreme Court's decision? [Letter]

    On her website, Sen. Barbara Mikulski proclaims that she is joining other senators to introduce a "legislative fix to protect women's health" following the Supreme Court's recent decision in the Hobby Lobby case. Whether you are for abortion or against abortion, whether you think your employer...

  • Pushy pro-lifers [Letter]

    Pushy pro-lifers [Letter]

    Letter writer Mary Catalfamo claims that Planned Parenthood denies any pregnant women immediate, free access to the full spectrum of information and counseling ("Supreme Court decisions won't limit women's rights," July 9).

  • An effort to shame, cloaked in the guise of women's empowerment [Letter]

    An effort to shame, cloaked in the guise of women's empowerment [Letter]

    Regarding the recent rant by small business woman and political activist Michelle Jefferson ("Stop griping and get a grip, ladies," July 11), it seems that she missed the most basic and fundamental message of the women's movement in the last century: don't leave your sisters behind.

  • Global needs: food and birth control [Letter]

    Global needs: food and birth control [Letter]

    While writer Mike Gesker ("U.S. food aid still critical abroad," July 10) rightly affirms our commitment to sending food to poor countries, as a member of Catholic Relief Services he fails though to address the other side of this economic problem.

Comments
Loading

70°