Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
NewsOpinionReaders Respond

Hopkins should be ashamed of the way it bullied Dr. Carson

FamilyMarriageSame-Sex MarriageJohns Hopkins University

In what possible way is Dr. Ben Carson's belief that marriage is between a man and a woman "in conflict with [Johns Hopkins University's] core values of diversity, inclusion and respect," as Hopkins Dean of Medicine Dr. Paul B. Rothman put it in a letter to colleagues ("Hopkins chides Carson for gay-marriage remarks," April 6).

Has it never occurred to Dr. Rothman and the left-wing progressives that redefining marriage is offensive to the vast majority of us who believe that marriage is, as Webster's puts it, "the state of being unified to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship."

To call Dr. Carson "homophobic," as Sun columnist Dan Rodricks recently did, is not only incorrect but hypocritical. Homophobia is a hatred or fear of homosexuals. Just because a person opposes same-sex marriage does not mean he or she hates or fears gays, who are entitled to equal rights under the law. That's what civil unions are for.

And for Hopkins student Jordan White to say that it was "unfortunate that [his comments on gay marriage] are the legacy that Ben Carson is leaving us" is preposterous. Here is a man who has achieved success against improbable odds and who any school should be honored to have as a commencement speaker.

Dr. Carson represents the best of what America offers and embodies the values and work ethic that made this country great.

Universities used to encourage diverse opinions and open debate. Hopkins should be ashamed of the way it has bullied Dr. Carson and sought to suppress his faith-based opinions.

Alexa Cameron

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    FamilyMarriageSame-Sex MarriageJohns Hopkins University
    • President Carson? [Letter]
      President Carson? [Letter]

      I'm glad to see Dr. Ben Carson is leading the Republican field of Presidential "hopefuls" — as in "I hope this isn't all they have to offer" ("O'Malley lags behind Clinton," Feb. 17). I'm sure he will prove to be just as viable candidate...

    • Carson defenders doctor the facts
      Carson defenders doctor the facts

      Given the despair I felt at reading the recent letters to the editor from Michael W. Kohlman ("If Drs. Ben Carson and Andy Harris oppose Obamacare, how great can it be?and Benedict Frederick Jr. ("Obamacare-slavery comparison isn't so ridiculous," Oct. 18) defending Dr....

    • Turns out Ben Carson is not expert on everything
      Turns out Ben Carson is not expert on everything

      Hopkins neurosurgeon Ben Carson's equating of the Affordable Care Act with slavery shows that expertise in one area does not necessarily carry over to other fields ("Sorry, Dr. Carson, but Obamacare is not like slavery," Oct. 15).

    • Obamacare-slavery comparison isn't so ridiculous
      Obamacare-slavery comparison isn't so ridiculous

      In his commentary ("Beneath contempt," Oct. 17), columnist Leonard Pitts Jr. of The Miami Herald is very critical of Dr. Ben Carson's recent comparison of Obamacare to slavery.

    • Ben Carson sinks beneath contempt
      Ben Carson sinks beneath contempt

      Neurosurgeon's claim that Obamacare is the worst thing since slavery lends racism a sheen of respectability

    • Cheap shots at Ben Carson
      Cheap shots at Ben Carson

      For reporter Jean Marbella to take shots at Dr. Ben Carson for his political views makes her look like she is not too bright — particularly in a Baltimore-based (albeit liberal) newspaper ("Carson is quoting Lenin to criticize Obamacare. Is the reference bogus?" Oct. 12).

    Comments
    Loading