Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
NewsOpinionReaders Respond

Would Ben Carson approve cutting research at Hopkins to balance the federal budget?

National GovernmentPersonal InvestingHealthcare ProvidersPersonal FinanceInsuranceYouTube

Having watched Dr. Ben Carson's speech at the National Prayer Breakfast on YouTube, I can accept his foray into politics because he has worked with people of all religions, and his scholarship fund has supported talented students regardless of race or religion ("Remarks vault Carson into the political arena," Feb. 18).

Dr. Carson is a good man. Yet I am flummoxed by his railings against political correctness. Now that he is retiring, he is free to sound off, but I am sure that at Hopkins he practiced political correctness as assiduously as anyone, else he could not have survived there. Hopkins has an international clientele, and because of that it must promote cultural sensitivity, which is just another name for political correctness so far as how people from different backgrounds ought to be treated.

But Dr. Carson went further in touching on the nation's financial state and health care system. He bemoaned the deficit and preached fiscal discipline to the feds, admonishing them for not balancing the budget and spending within their means.

Of course conservatives took him to their bosom, because he wants the nation to avoid deficit spending. But without deficit spending we are not going to have growth in this country and the end result will be even more massive layoffs and stagflation.

It is perverse to compare a nation as large and diverse as America to a family and impose on it the same fiscal principles a family needs to stay in the black. Yes, we should cut government bureaucracies and we should address the problems of waste and fraud. But to make deficit reduction a sole obsession, as many Republicans would, is bound to hurt the nation at a time when government spending is needed to bolster our infrastructure and research and development programs.

Dr. Carson works in a marvelous research institution. Would he be happy if the government took back the millions it has given Hopkins for basic science and clinical research in order to reduce the national debt and balance the budget?

Recently I read an alarming e-mail from the chancellor of a premier hospital system in this country to its employees, asking them to gird themselves for massive cuts, to the tune of $30 million, to cope with cuts in federal aid to hospitals. The letter advised that employees would have to do more for less, yet the hospital still expected the quality of care would not suffer.

Would Dr. Carson be happy if the national debt was reduced on the backs of the infirm and at the expense of health-care workers who are already stretched thin?

Dr. Carson wants to solve our health care woes with Health Savings Accounts. He thinks universal health care will be possible with such accounts, and that sounds great on paper. But we have a system whereby the healthy participate and help defray the costs for those who are ill. With Health Savings Accounts we can't have that. It will be everyone for himself, with no one to defray the costs of caring for the most severely ill or disabled patients unless the government stepped in to play the rescuer.

I don't think Dr. Carson has thought through such issues carefully enough. That said, all his comments about how we should value education and pay homage to our scholars are right on. His work funding the Carson Scholars is admirable. Perhaps Dr. Carson should stay out of politics and soar above the fray, like the bald eagle he so admired at the end of his speech.

Usha Nellore, Bel Air

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    National GovernmentPersonal InvestingHealthcare ProvidersPersonal FinanceInsuranceYouTube
    • President Carson? [Letter]
      President Carson? [Letter]

      I'm glad to see Dr. Ben Carson is leading the Republican field of Presidential "hopefuls" — as in "I hope this isn't all they have to offer" ("O'Malley lags behind Clinton," Feb. 17). I'm sure he will prove to be just as viable candidate...

    • Carson defenders doctor the facts
      Carson defenders doctor the facts

      Given the despair I felt at reading the recent letters to the editor from Michael W. Kohlman ("If Drs. Ben Carson and Andy Harris oppose Obamacare, how great can it be?and Benedict Frederick Jr. ("Obamacare-slavery comparison isn't so ridiculous," Oct. 18) defending Dr....

    • Turns out Ben Carson is not expert on everything
      Turns out Ben Carson is not expert on everything

      Hopkins neurosurgeon Ben Carson's equating of the Affordable Care Act with slavery shows that expertise in one area does not necessarily carry over to other fields ("Sorry, Dr. Carson, but Obamacare is not like slavery," Oct. 15).

    • Obamacare-slavery comparison isn't so ridiculous
      Obamacare-slavery comparison isn't so ridiculous

      In his commentary ("Beneath contempt," Oct. 17), columnist Leonard Pitts Jr. of The Miami Herald is very critical of Dr. Ben Carson's recent comparison of Obamacare to slavery.

    • Ben Carson sinks beneath contempt
      Ben Carson sinks beneath contempt

      Neurosurgeon's claim that Obamacare is the worst thing since slavery lends racism a sheen of respectability

    • Cheap shots at Ben Carson
      Cheap shots at Ben Carson

      For reporter Jean Marbella to take shots at Dr. Ben Carson for his political views makes her look like she is not too bright — particularly in a Baltimore-based (albeit liberal) newspaper ("Carson is quoting Lenin to criticize Obamacare. Is the reference bogus?" Oct. 12).

    Comments
    Loading