Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Carson critic reveals his own problem with intolerance

I found Dan Rodricks' column on Dr. Ben Carson jaded and biased ("Ben Carson's biblically based conservatism," March 31).

Mr. Rodricks accused Dr. Carson of making homophobic remarks, but it was just his opinion that the remarks were homophobic in nature. Mr. Rodricks should write a column every week denouncing those who oppose gay marriage for their anti-gay bigotry.

I believe that homosexuals should have the same rights as any other citizen. However, if they need to legalize their actions they should do so and call it something other than marriage.

Centuries of civil and religious ceremony lie behind the relationship between a man and woman who chose to join together, and it is called a marriage. Just because that isn't politically correct shouldn't make us change the definition to suit those who practice homosexuality.

If you look up marriage in the dictionary it is specific in definition and not arbitrary. To include homosexuals under the same centuries old identification denigrates the past and current relationship of millions of persons in a marital union.

It is not homophobic to have this opinion or belief. Legalizing gay unions and calling the union a marriage will flaunt cultural mores and the sensibility of millions of people. It is as ridiculous as calling one of the partners in such a relationship the wife, if both partners are male; or calling one of the partners in such a relationship the husband if both partners are female.

Additionally, Mr. Rodricks chose to discuss other concerns that Dr. Carson has expressed. Mr. Rodricks obviously disagree with Dr. Carson on a range of subjects. But when he implies that all those who agree with Dr. Carson are to be disregarded, one wonders who set him up as an authority on anything?

If anything, Mr. Rodricks' column reflects the views of a man who has no tolerance for any point of view other than his own.

William Engle

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • President Carson? [Letter]
      President Carson? [Letter]

      I'm glad to see Dr. Ben Carson is leading the Republican field of Presidential "hopefuls" — as in "I hope this isn't all they have to offer" ("O'Malley lags behind Clinton," Feb. 17). I'm sure he will prove to be just as viable candidate as Herman Cain, Rick Santorum, Sarah Palin, Newt...

    • Carson defenders doctor the facts
      Carson defenders doctor the facts

      Given the despair I felt at reading the recent letters to the editor from Michael W. Kohlman ("If Drs. Ben Carson and Andy Harris oppose Obamacare, how great can it be?and Benedict Frederick Jr. ("Obamacare-slavery comparison isn't so ridiculous," Oct. 18) defending Dr. Ben Carson's...

    • Turns out Ben Carson is not expert on everything
      Turns out Ben Carson is not expert on everything

      Hopkins neurosurgeon Ben Carson's equating of the Affordable Care Act with slavery shows that expertise in one area does not necessarily carry over to other fields ("Sorry, Dr. Carson, but Obamacare is not like slavery," Oct. 15).

    • Obamacare-slavery comparison isn't so ridiculous
      Obamacare-slavery comparison isn't so ridiculous

      In his commentary ("Beneath contempt," Oct. 17), columnist Leonard Pitts Jr. of The Miami Herald is very critical of Dr. Ben Carson's recent comparison of Obamacare to slavery.

    • Ben Carson sinks beneath contempt
      Ben Carson sinks beneath contempt

      Neurosurgeon's claim that Obamacare is the worst thing since slavery lends racism a sheen of respectability

    • Cheap shots at Ben Carson
      Cheap shots at Ben Carson

      For reporter Jean Marbella to take shots at Dr. Ben Carson for his political views makes her look like she is not too bright — particularly in a Baltimore-based (albeit liberal) newspaper ("Carson is quoting Lenin to criticize Obamacare. Is the reference bogus?" Oct. 12).

    Comments
    Loading