Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

If Drs. Ben Carson and Andy Harris oppose Obamacare, how great can it be?

This is in regard to a column and an op-ed that you published Thursday. When I saw the headline titled, "Political system influenced by sociopaths” (Oct. 17) then saw Dan Rodricks' name and busted out laughing thinking he had an epiphany!

I was shocked to see a virtual conversation involving Wayne Gilchrest waxing about the good old days of moderation while Rep. Andy Harris is presented more as an ideologue and far to the right.  Having met and known about him, he does share his beliefs, holds himself accountable to the public, and really states his cases well.

In another op-ed column, writer Leonard Pitts Jr. chides Dr. Ben Carson on his use of the term, “slavery” in reference to his belief on health care reform as “sadly unremarkable,” then accused him of adhering to some hidden tablet of its usage and misusage ("Beneath contempt," Oct. 17).

I looked up the definitions of slavery and there are several including, “2. : submission to a dominating influence.”  I feel that Dr. Carson used it appropriately to express his feelings about opinions about health care reform and the effect it will have on us.

If it is between Mr. Pitts and Dr. Carson, I have to go with Dr. Carson. My fear is that he is proven right, and being a brain surgeon, always had to make sure he is right. Both men are not only doctors but good people as well and since you seem to be on the opposite side of such learned people, wonder if I would believe you when you tout how great this heath care reform will actually be.

Michael W. Kohlman, Baltimore

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Health exchange still a hassle
    Health exchange still a hassle

    I found The Sun's editorial, "Beyond the website" (Nov. 23), about how well the new-and-improved Maryland Health Connection had launched to be ironic and not in a good way. Perhaps you should have looked beyond the health insurance website itself to see if the system really had been improved...

  • Why don't Dems question Md.'s flawed health exchange rollout?
    Why don't Dems question Md.'s flawed health exchange rollout?

    Who are Gov. Martin O'Malley and Attorney General Doug Gansler trying to kid? The reason potential litigation over the flawed rollout of Maryland's health exchange is being postponed is the upcoming election. They are deeply afraid of what Noridian is going to claim about Lt. Gov. Anthony...

  • Sun's stupidity is showing
    Sun's stupidity is showing

    You have published several articles recently in support of Obamacare but have chosen to ignore the news of how this hoax was enacted through deception, fraud, misrepresentation of material facts and outright lies ("Who are you calling stupid?" Nov. 14)!

  • Obamacare: Beyond the website
    Obamacare: Beyond the website

    While it's too early to declare the new Maryland health insurance exchange website a complete success, its largely smooth launch this week offers the prospect that this open enrollment period will be focused less on the technology and more on ensuring Marylanders are getting access to high...

  • Getting help with health exchange
    Getting help with health exchange

    We couldn't agree more with the importance of consumers getting in-person assistance when they purchase health insurance ("Obamacare: Beyond the website," Nov. 21). That's why the Maryland Women's Coalition for Health Care Reform named Maryland's connector entities with their navigators and...

  • Health site has political overtones
    Health site has political overtones

    The Maryland Health Connection website is certainly much improved from its original debut, but why has it been politicized ("With Obamacare, health insurance leads to better health," Nov. 18)? The prominent heading on the exchange is "Change is here" echoing President Barack Obama's campaign...

Comments
Loading