Get unlimited digital access to $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Carson's were views taken out of context

Dr. Benjamin Carson's remarks have been taken grossly out of context by critics who refuse to acknowledge that homosexuals, who cannot procreate, have no bona fide interest in the same government protected marriage rights and responsibilities that heterosexual couples are subject to ("Hopkins chides Carson for gay-marriage remarks," April 6).

Unlike the growing number of bigots at Hopkins and elsewhere who denounce all non-supporters of same-sex marriage, Dr. Carson was in no way the least bit critical of homosexuality.

He understands that traditional marriage institutions grew primarily out of cultural, historical and ultimately theological concerns that males' irresponsibility toward children they fathered was socially disastrous.

The once common practice of "shotgun" weddings was perhaps as responsible for the dramatically improved life and health of women and children as the creation of the institution itself.

Unlike homosexuals, bisexual, polyandrous, polygamous and other groups do produce offspring. Yet there is very little support for gay marriages even among homosexuals or their families. And as Dr. Carson noted, there is little support by anyone for marriages between partners who advocate man-boy love or bestiality.

Government should not be involved in same-sex unions in any manner. Other than money from the government, gay couples can obtain just about all the other benefits of marriage on their own, either through their own contractual agreements or application for government benefits as individuals. Nor should they be categorically denied the right to adopt children any more than unmarried heterosexuals.

Barry C. Steel, Phoenix

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • President Carson? [Letter]
      President Carson? [Letter]

      I'm glad to see Dr. Ben Carson is leading the Republican field of Presidential "hopefuls" — as in "I hope this isn't all they have to offer" ("O'Malley lags behind Clinton," Feb. 17). I'm sure he will prove to be just as viable candidate as Herman Cain, Rick Santorum, Sarah Palin, Newt...

    • Carson defenders doctor the facts
      Carson defenders doctor the facts

      Given the despair I felt at reading the recent letters to the editor from Michael W. Kohlman ("If Drs. Ben Carson and Andy Harris oppose Obamacare, how great can it be?and Benedict Frederick Jr. ("Obamacare-slavery comparison isn't so ridiculous," Oct. 18) defending Dr. Ben Carson's...

    • Turns out Ben Carson is not expert on everything
      Turns out Ben Carson is not expert on everything

      Hopkins neurosurgeon Ben Carson's equating of the Affordable Care Act with slavery shows that expertise in one area does not necessarily carry over to other fields ("Sorry, Dr. Carson, but Obamacare is not like slavery," Oct. 15).

    • Obamacare-slavery comparison isn't so ridiculous
      Obamacare-slavery comparison isn't so ridiculous

      In his commentary ("Beneath contempt," Oct. 17), columnist Leonard Pitts Jr. of The Miami Herald is very critical of Dr. Ben Carson's recent comparison of Obamacare to slavery.

    • Ben Carson sinks beneath contempt
      Ben Carson sinks beneath contempt

      Neurosurgeon's claim that Obamacare is the worst thing since slavery lends racism a sheen of respectability

    • Cheap shots at Ben Carson
      Cheap shots at Ben Carson

      For reporter Jean Marbella to take shots at Dr. Ben Carson for his political views makes her look like she is not too bright — particularly in a Baltimore-based (albeit liberal) newspaper ("Carson is quoting Lenin to criticize Obamacare. Is the reference bogus?" Oct. 12).