Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Future of transportation is cleaner and more efficient

I was reading the recent article about folks who live without a motor vehicle ("For some, life can be sweeter with no car," July 27) and I was impressed with Hampden resident Kathy Harget's choice to live without a car. Of course, many of us need to have a car in order to travel back and forth to places like work, to pick up kids from day-care, or for business travel.

People who need cars, however, have reason to be excited about reducing oil and gas consumption in the near future as well. It was exciting to hear that President Barack Obama recently announce a new fuel mileage standard of 54.5 mpg by 2025.

Hopefully, this new standard will come into law without any loopholes, and will enable us to all have an opportunity to reduce our individual pollution levels while also saving money at the gas pump in the future. The standards would cut annual emissions of global warming pollution by as much as 280 million metric tons and save Americans over $80 billion at the gas pump annually.

Foster Hardiman,Washington, D.C.

The writer is clean cars organizer at Environment Maryland.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Climate change and national security

    Climate change and national security

    Your editorial "The danger of climate denial" (May 22) offered a dismal forecast, yet some people continue to deny that climate change is real or that it is caused at least in part by human activity.

  • Holding one's breath, GOP style

    Holding one's breath, GOP style

    Last month, the Obama administration announced tougher Clean Air Act rules intended to reduce ground-level ozone, the chief component of the smog that plagues the Baltimore-Washington area and much of the nation. With at least half the pollution blowing into Maryland from the burning of fossil...

  • GDP must consider environmental costs

    GDP must consider environmental costs

    The Sun's recent editorial about the GOP's intention to gut the EPA's authority to regulate carbon dioxide emissions touches on an important economic issue ("Holding one's breath, GOP-style," Dec. 9).

  • Is Obama overly ambitious on ozone regulations?

    Is Obama overly ambitious on ozone regulations?

    President Barack Obama has a narrowing window to secure a legacy in which he can take pride and which historians will applaud and note with favor. Freed from having to run for office ever again, President Obama can focus on his legacy, work to ensure that a Democrat succeeds him in the White House...

  • Smog limits are badly needed

    Smog limits are badly needed

    Maryland has the worst air on the East Coast and highest premature death rate in the nation. National Academy of Sciences data suggest that health impacts resulting from fossil fuels cost $73 per household per month in Maryland and are a drag on the economy. Yet conservative deniers and their self-serving,...

  • A healthier way to fly

    A healthier way to fly

    Last week, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency took the first step toward reducing greenhouse gas emissions from airplanes. The rule-making process will take months if not years, but the lingering question is, how will the proposed regulations fit with what other countries are doing about...

  • City smog threatens our health and the economy

    City smog threatens our health and the economy

    The EPA's recent decision to tighten limits on smog pollution is commendable and necessary ("Holding one's breath, GOP style," Dec. 8).

  • Forget hurricanes, the real threat to Md. is the rising sea level

    Forget hurricanes, the real threat to Md. is the rising sea level

    Your editorial "Don't take hurricanes lightly" (June 7) noted the threat hurricanes pose to Maryland, but the oceans hold much deadlier and persistent danger: Sea level rise.

Comments
Loading
73°