Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Why stop at recording conversations on buses?

What a superb idea it is to monitor conversations on buses! ("MTA is recording bus conversations," Oct. 18.) Everyone understands that the kind of people who ride buses can't be trusted. The shame is that we haven't yet carried the idea far enough.

Obviously, if the kind of people who ride buses should be monitored, we should also monitor those who ride light rail. And people who ride in airplanes can't be trusted, as 9/11 and numerous hijackings have demonstrated. In fact, security measures in airports would be greatly helped if we recorded all the conversations in airports, and, of course, we should extend the policies to trains and train stations.

It might seem that recording all these conversations would overburden our monitoring and surveillance capabilities, but rapidly improving technology should take care of that. In fact, we could overcome many of the problems with imaginative use of current technology. Cell phones can already be used to track our locations. They could be used to record and transmit conversations if only appropriate functions in them were hard-wired to be always on.

And, utilizing such capabilities while requiring everyone to carry a cell phone, we could record all conversations, and thus ensure security in all public places, government-owned buildings, and places of business. Oh, what a secure place America would become!

Ken Allen

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Who thinks the GOP would do better at running cities?

    Who thinks the GOP would do better at running cities?

    Richard Franz in his column "Should cities drop dems?" (July 2) points out correctly that major U.S. cities have rather consistently elected Democrats as their mayors and that most of these cities, especially along the East Coast, remain dysfunctional and are plagued with poverty and crime.

  • Sheila Dixon represents everything the Baltimore uprising was against

    Sheila Dixon represents everything the Baltimore uprising was against

    If Donald Trump can legitimately contend for the Republican presidential nomination, then I suppose it is not inconceivable that Sheila Dixon is running again for mayor of Baltimore ("Former Baltimore Mayor Sheila Dixon enters 2016 mayoral race," July 1). But it's unclear which candidate is more...

  • Honor our heritage by taking down Confederate memorials

    Honor our heritage by taking down Confederate memorials

    I write in support of removing symbols of the Confederacy from publicly owned places, including Robert E. Lee Park ("Status of Confederate statues to be reviewed in Baltimore," June 30).

  • Get states out of the marriage business

    Get states out of the marriage business

    In light of the recent Supreme Court on same sex marriage being protected under the Constitution ("Freedom to marry," June 27), there is now a movement afoot in Montana by a Mormon, Nathan Collier, who is legally married to Vicki, to be allowed to marry his second wife, Christine. Many have predicted...

  • Sheila Dixon's time has passed

    Sheila Dixon's time has passed

    Your recent editorial on the candidacy of Sheila Dixon to run again for Mayor of Baltimore City hit all the right notes ("Dixon's return," July 2). I can forgive the pettiness of her gift card theft and see that as a character flaw that she in incapable of seeing in herself. What I can't forgive...

  • Is 'Lake Roland Park' a sufficiently P.C. name?

    Is 'Lake Roland Park' a sufficiently P.C. name?

    No one seems to remember that Lake Roland was originally called Swann Lake when it was completed in 1861 ("Rename Robert E. Lee Park," June 23). It was named for Mayor Thomas Swann of Baltimore City who spelled his name with two n's. Swann was later governor of Maryland. At some point the lake...

Comments
Loading

81°