Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

The fallacies of a birth injury fund [Letter]

There are two glaring fallacies in the editorial "More study needed on birth injury bill" (March 13).

The first is that medical malpractice awards affect practice closings. There is no credible evidence to support this. This "medical myth" keeps surfacing, despite lots of evidence to the contrary.

The second is that only well to do families will be able to "afford" to hire good attorneys and pay witnesses. Plaintiffs lawyers do not charge clients but take a portion of an award should they win.

The real tragedy is that medical malpractice caps limit the ability of malpractice firms to take on cases unless there is a strong likelihood that the award will provide meaningful compensation for the family, plus cover the law firm's expenses, which often run into the hundreds of thousands of dollars. This economic dynamic leaves most seriously hurt patients and their families without judicial recourse, forces them into bankruptcy, and shifts the medical burdens onto taxpayers.

Teresa P. Kelly

To respond to this letter, send an email to Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Maternity wards at risk [Commentary]
    Maternity wards at risk [Commentary]

    Birth injury fund could keep malpractice costs down and maternity wards operating

  • More study needed on birth injury bill [Editorial]
    More study needed on birth injury bill [Editorial]

    Our view: Proposed alternative to litigation for birth injuries is promising but poses enough questions to warrant more study by the General Assembly

  • Maryland bill would create birth injury fund
    Maryland bill would create birth injury fund

    Some hospitals seek legislation to help with malpractice

  • Birth injury fund is a good idea [Letter]
    Birth injury fund is a good idea [Letter]

    The article, "Birth injury fund sought" (Feb. 9), brought back memories of a fight my husband, Dr. John M. Freeman, waged from 1985 until his death on January 3. As chair of a National Institutes of Health committee to determine prenatal and perinatal factors associated with brain disorders,...

  • Md. needs outpatient commitment
    Md. needs outpatient commitment

    The article by Meredith Cohn, "Involuntary treatment for the mentally ill in Maryland" (Dec. 10) and your editorial, "Refusing treatment" (Dec. 11), are very accurate. I know because I have had to deal with my son's refusal to take any medication for many years. He is psychotic and very...

  • Outpatient commitment law is crucial
    Outpatient commitment law is crucial

    In response to The Sun's recent editorial, "Refusing treatment" (Dec. 11), what disability rights groups omit when they say that "assertive community outpatient services" are better than outpatient civil commitment for the seriously mentally are the following sad and enduring facts.