Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

No point in studying flawed idea of a birth injury fund [Letter]

The editorial "More study needed on birth injury bill" (March 12) supports the creation of a "task force" to study the implementation of a "new" system for handling medical negligence cases involving birth-related neurological injuries, similar to a program in Virginia.

The idea of studying the Virginia program here in Maryland is far from new. Bills to create such a task force were introduced — and failed to garner support — in 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008. Del. Dan K. Morhaim, the doctor-legislator leading the current effort, was a lead sponsor of three of the four previously-introduced bills.

The General Assembly was right to reject a task force in the past. Time that public officials spend on a task force is time that they can't spend addressing other, more urgent issues. No public time or taxpayer money should be wasted on a task force to study yet another failed system with illusory promises to resolve medical negligence claims out of court.

In the mid-1970's, supporters of another "new" system promised that mandatory arbitration would resolve medical negligence claims faster and more efficiently, saving everyone time and money. In reality, mandatory arbitration was an expensive disaster, and calls for its repeal have been echoing in Annapolis ever since.

The Virginia program is an even greater disaster, and everyone knows it. Virginia's insurance companies and hospitals promised to fund the program, but ever since they got tort immunity, they have been fighting to avoid paying up. Meanwhile, infant victims of medical negligence are shut out of Virginia's courts and must hire lawyers and sue the Commonwealth for a chance to get money from a fiscally unsound program that carries tens of millions of dollars in unfunded liabilities on its books.

Unlike the 1970's, there is no medical malpractice "crisis" at the present time. Maryland is an attractive place for doctors to practice medicine — the AMA reports that Maryland ranks second out of all 50 states in the number of active physicians per capita. The number of filed medical negligence claims is down in Maryland for the third year in a row, and the market for malpractice insurance here is stable, with the state's largest insurer giving 36 percent in premium discounts and credits to the obstetricians and other private physicians that it insures.

We don't need to waste public time and money to know that Virginia's failed no-fault program is a bad idea for Maryland.

George S. Tolley III, Timonium

The writer is immediate past president of the Maryland Association for Justice, which represents more than 1,300 trial attorneys in Maryland.

To respond to this letter, send an email to Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Maryland bill would create birth injury fund

    Maryland bill would create birth injury fund

    Some hospitals seek legislation to help with malpractice

  • Maternity wards at risk [Commentary]

    Maternity wards at risk [Commentary]

    Birth injury fund could keep malpractice costs down and maternity wards operating

  • Birth injury fund is a good idea [Letter]

    Birth injury fund is a good idea [Letter]

    The article, "Birth injury fund sought" (Feb. 9), brought back memories of a fight my husband, Dr. John M. Freeman, waged from 1985 until his death on January 3. As chair of a National Institutes of Health committee to determine prenatal and perinatal factors associated with brain disorders, John...

  • Birth injury fund would let bad doctors off the hook [Letter]

    Birth injury fund would let bad doctors off the hook [Letter]

    A recent article reported that Maryland is considering legislation to establish a state fund to compensate babies born with brain injuries, similar to Virginia's law ("Maryland bill would create birth injury fund," Feb. 10). This would be a mistake.

  • Baltimore needs BRT

    Baltimore needs BRT

    Recently, Lt. Gov. Boyd Rutherford announced that Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) should be considered as an alternative instead of the now-shelved Red Line light rail system ("Who knew Hogan, Rutherford were such transit geeks," July 15). Why? Costs. Light rail is extremely expensive — to the tune of...

  • Iran deal — war now or war later

    Iran deal — war now or war later

    In its recent editorial, The Sun adopts President Barack Obama's primary argument in favor of the Iran deal — that the only choice is the deal or war ("A 'good enough' agreement," July 24). No one wants war. But the choice here is not war or no war. It is war now or war later.