In Case You Missed It: Baltimore Marathon Photos
NewsOpinionReaders Respond

Reimer wrong on birth control flap

Family PlanningFeminismBarack Obama

In response to Susan Reimer's column ("Women will remember in November," March 12), it is amazing to me that she, and others cannot see through the fog that is being intentionally created by President Barack Obama and the Democrats.

No one on the right is calling for additional restrictions on birth control or contraceptive access. The debate has nothing to do with birth control and women's rights. It is, however, about something more important, and that is the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution which all politicians have taken an oath to uphold and support. President Obama has, under recently-adopted regulations stemming from his health care reform law, dictated that Catholic and other religious institutions and employers (and their insurance providers) must provide certain free birth control and contraceptive means and services, which are contrary to their basic religious tenets and beliefs. That is a violation of the First Amendment. I am not Catholic, but an assault on their First Amendment liberties should concern us all.

To couch the issues and debate as an assault on birth control, as Ms. Reimer does, is not only wrong, but it serves to further the Obama administration's real purpose, which is to call attention to social, class, and sexual issues and away from what is really important and vital in the coming election — that is Mr. Obama's dismal record on the economy, jobs, taxes, debt and unemployment.

Paul F. Robinson, Baltimore

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
Family PlanningFeminismBarack Obama
  • Why is Mikulski trying to 'fix' the Supreme Court's decision? [Letter]
    Why is Mikulski trying to 'fix' the Supreme Court's decision? [Letter]

    On her website, Sen. Barbara Mikulski proclaims that she is joining other senators to introduce a "legislative fix to protect women's health" following the Supreme Court's recent decision in the Hobby Lobby case. Whether you are for abortion or against abortion, whether...

  • Pushy pro-lifers [Letter]
    Pushy pro-lifers [Letter]

    Letter writer Mary Catalfamo claims that Planned Parenthood denies any pregnant women immediate, free access to the full spectrum of information and counseling ("Supreme Court decisions won't limit women's rights," July 9).

  • An effort to shame, cloaked in the guise of women's empowerment [Letter]
    An effort to shame, cloaked in the guise of women's empowerment [Letter]

    Regarding the recent rant by small business woman and political activist Michelle Jefferson ("Stop griping and get a grip, ladies," July 11), it seems that she missed the most basic and fundamental message of the women's movement in the last century: don't leave your sisters...

  • Global needs: food and birth control [Letter]
    Global needs: food and birth control [Letter]

    While writer Mike Gesker ("U.S. food aid still critical abroad," July 10) rightly affirms our commitment to sending food to poor countries, as a member of Catholic Relief Services he fails though to address the other side of this economic problem.

  • Misreporting the Hobby Lobby decision [Letter]
    Misreporting the Hobby Lobby decision [Letter]

    The Supreme Court decision in the Hobby Lobby case was confined specifically to exempting some employers from having to pay for medications or procedures that terminate a pregnancy after conception ("Court sides with employers in contraception case," June 30).

  • Hobby Lobby decision a case for Supreme Court term limits [Letter]
    Hobby Lobby decision a case for Supreme Court term limits [Letter]

    The inane Hobby Lobby decision clearly shows it is time to set term limits for the judges of the Supreme Court ("Corporations vs. people," June 30). It is time to get rid of Justice Antonin Scalia — the smuggest among the high court's nine, and Clarence Thomas — the...

Comments
Loading