Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
NewsOpinionReaders Respond

Bike helmets should be optional

Bicycle Racing

Having ridden bicycles since childhood, I prefer not to wear a bicycle helmet ("The bike helmet debate," Feb. 16. However, I would not want to discourage a rider who feels more secure in wearing one.

Having also ridden motorcycles, and being a believer in the use of standard full head helmets while riding them, I can say there is a major difference in the level of safety provided by the two vastly different types of helmets. If I believed a helmet should be worn while riding a bicycle, I would use the motorcycle type.

The bike helmets being advocated are flimsily constructed by comparison. They were developed by the bicycle racing industry, and — along with wraparound mirrored sunglasses and kaleidoscopically colored spandex unitards — give that testosterone-charged appearance so desperately desired by bicycle marketers.

In spite of the fact that motorcycle-type helmets offer much greater protection, it's interesting to note that their use has not been advocated in the bicycle racing world, or in discussions of bicycle safety in general.

It is not uncommon to read about serious injuries or deaths as a result of bicycle accidents even though the rider was wearing a helmet. In some cases the helmet simply cracked or slipped out of place due to it not being strapped on tightly enough.

In other cases, the rider was annihilated by in a collision with a car or truck. Bicycling will always carry a certain degree of risk, and protecting only the top of one's head is not a rational prescription for safe riding.

Bicycle riding comes in all sizes and shapes, from cross country riding and racing to simply expediting movement across a few city blocks. It occurs in cold weather, where the bird's nest helmet requires the use of a hat underneath for warmth (and renders the helmet useless due to improper fit), and during warm weather, when the head band becomes wet with sweat.

For quick in-town jaunts or short leisure rides, the inconvenience of the helmet makes it a non-starter for one who has ridden a lifetime without one. For a lengthy road ride in traffic lanes, or a race, I would opt for the protection of a standard, full-head, motorcycle-type helmet.

Nor is there much in the way of definitive statistics regarding the safety of bicycle helmet use — what types of accidents are they most effective in, what are the fatality rates for users versus nonusers, what percentage of bicycle accidents involve head injuries as opposed to abrasions or broken bones. We in the U.S. should pay attention to what people in the Netherlands do; they are the most prolific riders on the planet, and they're not clamoring for helmets.

Intuition would suggest a better approach to bike safety lies in simple common sense precautions, such as avoiding heavily trafficked roads, better training of drivers to watch for bikes and more bicycle lanes in cities. Bicycle riders really don't need another poorly conceived government mandate jammed down our throats.

Gary Moyer, Baltimore City

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    Bicycle Racing
    • Bike helmets: Put a lid on it
      Bike helmets: Put a lid on it

      Why is there any debate about requiring a simple step that will save lives and prevent injuries?

    • Bike safety requires more than helmets
      Bike safety requires more than helmets

      Although I always wear a helmet when bicycling, the feel-good bill to mandate adult bike helmets has flaws ("Helmet bill gets objections from bike advocates," Feb. 13). First, the bill would adversely impact the poor, minorities, and immigrants who don't own a car and depend upon their...

    • Bike helmets have their benefits
      Bike helmets have their benefits

      Letter writer Kevin Strickler says that requiring bicyclists to wear helmets will lead to fewer bikers ("Helmet laws will reduce number of bikers," Feb. 19). I say that not wearing helmets will reduce the number of bikers in a most unpleasant way — by more deaths on the road.

    • Motorcyclists share bicyclists' helmet concerns
      Motorcyclists share bicyclists' helmet concerns

      As a motorcyclist, I am always fascinated by the concerns of bicyclists as to helmets ("Helmet bills gets objections from bike advocates," Feb. 13). If you switched the mode of transportation, you would see the same arguments apply. Yet motorcyclists are not allowed the same opportunity...

    • Helmet laws will reduce number of bikers
      Helmet laws will reduce number of bikers

      Baltimore has made a great deal of progress in making itself more bike friendly ("Cycling advocates fight proposed helmet law, preferring 'safety in numbers'" Feb 13). As a homeowner in Baltimore City, I enjoy the convenience of jumping on my bike to make short trips to run errands rather...

    • Helmet-less cyclists come up lame
      Helmet-less cyclists come up lame

      I am a cyclist who has done big miles for a long span of years. I am also one who was hit from behind by a car in 2005, an accident which both projected me 85 feet into the air and required more than a year of recovery. I was lucky to survive and would not have, save for the helmet I was...

    • Cycling advocates fight proposed helmet law, preferring 'safety in numbers'
      Cycling advocates fight proposed helmet law, preferring 'safety in numbers'

      State lawmakers considering requirement for all to wear protective headgear while biking

    • Bike helmets seem pretty reasonable
      Bike helmets seem pretty reasonable

      I was surprised there is opposition to requiring all bike riders wear helmets ("Helmet bill gets objections from bike advocates," Feb. 13). In my 2,500-pound car I must wear a seat belt and am surrounded by airbags. It is because people may be involved in accidents (by definition an unplanned...

    Comments
    Loading