Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Several Benghazi questions unanswered

The Benghazi hearings may be a political play by the GOP but no more so than the blockage of information by the Obama administration in September and October right before the election ("Benghazi deserves real review," May 10).

I have yet to see any meaningful discussion in The Sun about why Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens was in Benghazi without appropriate security in the first place and why no was action taken to try to help (as it used to be an American tradition to help its citizens when in trouble) — even if it was too late. Also, what took the administration so long to tell the American people (if they have) what really happened?

Lyle Rescott, Marriottsville

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Benghazi suspect's capture overdue [Letter]

    Benghazi suspect's capture overdue [Letter]

    Weeks after the attack in Benghazi, American reporters interviewed Ahmed Abu Khatallah at a cafe in Libya, so why did it take our government almost two years to capture him and why now on Fathers Day ("Benghazi suspect was planning more attacks, U.S. tells U.N.," June 18)?

  • Benghazi questions unanswered

    Benghazi questions unanswered

    Was the Benghazi Coverup done because it might have affected Barack Obama's re-election chances in 2012 and Hillary Clinton's White House run in 2016? The latest report is virtually saying that no one is to blame ("Tom Schaller: The right systematically manufactures bogus news," Nov. 25).