Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Why does Dr. Carson support a party that opposes equal rights?

I support The Sun's position on Dr. Ben Carson ("The price of free speech," April 13). Dr. Carson was accorded his First Amendment right to freely express his views on marriage equality — and those outraged by the hurtful and insulting comments he made also have a right to express theirs. Not only that, Hopkins students have a right to a say in who addresses their commencement.

What I find most disturbing about Dr. Carson's views is that they generally reflect right-wing Republican ideas.

Given that it has been Democrats who have supported civil rights, voting rights and affirmative action ever since the South went from solidly Democratic to solidly Republican after the passage of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, I find it strange that Dr. Carson would hold such conservative views, even though he undoubtedly has benefited from the changes that have occurred since the 1960s.

Jack Kinstlinger, Baltimore

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Ben Carson's conservative approach to health care reform [Letter]

    Ben Carson's conservative approach to health care reform [Letter]

    I wonder why letter writer S. R. Cohen is so quick to attack neurosurgeon Ben Carson when he seems so unaware of Mr. Carson's beliefs ("Ben Carson commits 'values malpractice,'" March 16).

  • Carson is no 'simpleton'

    Carson is no 'simpleton'

    I am a 50-something, Jesuit-educated, Libertarian-leaning registered Democrat who has been reading Thomas F. Schaller's column for years. He has the luxury of at least being accepted around liberals and only being castigated by conservatives. Libertarian thinkers eventually are attacked by both...

  • Ben Carson's own words show he's ill-suited to office

    Ben Carson's own words show he's ill-suited to office

    Thomas Schaller makes a strong case that Dr. Ben Carson should stick to medicine ("Carson should stick to medicine," Feb. 3). Mr. Schaller did not need to stray far for evidence: He cites Dr. Carson's own public pronouncements for curing the nation's ills, namely, his call for a flat tax which...

  • Carson v. Obama

    Carson v. Obama

    How can columnist Thomas F. Schaller compare Michael Jordan trying to hit a 95-mph fastball to Ben Carson being president of the United States? Is he saying a community organizer was more prepared to be president than Dr. Carson ("Ben Carson should stick to medicine," Feb. 3)?

  • Is Carson's race the problem?

    Is Carson's race the problem?

    I find it interesting that columnist Thomas F. Schaller can champion our "community organizer" president as all-knowing, intelligent and, of all things, competent, yet Ben Carson, a world-renowned brain surgeon and Herman Cain, a very successful business owner, don't have the ability to be president,...

  • Carson speaks truth

    Carson speaks truth

    Thomas F. Schaller's analogy comparing Michael Jordan's attempt to play baseball to Ben Carson's qualifications to be president is asinine ("Carson, stick to medicine," Feb. 4). Why don't we just expand that assertion to dissuade political science teachers from becoming newspaper columnists?

  • Carson should run for president

    Carson should run for president

    Columnist Thomas F. Schaller makes reference to some prominent individuals who failed to succeed in business, but he may be too young to remember that a shopkeeper named Harry S. Truman defeated a favored Republican, Thomas E. Dewey, in 1946 ("Ben Carson should stick to medicine," Feb. 3).

  • Columnist, heal thyself

    Columnist, heal thyself

    Thomas F. Schaller's piece on Ben Carson is nothing more than an ad hominem attack, an attack more appropriate to a blog from the fever swamps of the ideological left than a nationally-recognized newspaper ("Carson, stick to medicine," Feb. 4). Frank Kent has to be spinning in his grave.

Comments
Loading
77°