Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Last chance to save the bay [Letter]

The Chesapeake Bay, one of Maryland's greatest assets, is currently being threatened. Yet the Maryland legislature is again poised to delay action ("Senators seek to stall pollution regulations," March 10).

The Chesapeake Bay is currently under siege from colossal factory chicken farms and the monumental amounts of pollution they produce. Approximately 13.1 million pounds of phosphorus reached the bay during 2012, and more than half of that pollution came from agriculture.

Phosphorous pollution poses a very real danger to the bay, creating enormous dead zones, spanning vast ranges of aquatic ecosystems that were previously rich in biodiversity and fishing opportunities. Now, those delicate ecosystems are replaced by massive algae blooms that die quickly and consume huge amounts of oxygen as they decay. As a result, oxygen in the water decreases drastically, effectively suffocating all aquatic life in the ecosystem.

But there is help for this pollution nightmare. The Phosphorous Management Tool developed by scientists at the University of Maryland would, if implemented, have the potential to regulate and decrease the amount of phosphorus entering the bay from agriculture by tracking which farms pollute the most.

The updated PMT reflects more than 10 years of research, and UM scientists Donald Boesch, Russ Brinsfield, Frank Coale and Joshua McGrath state that "without action, high phosphorus 'hot spots' will continue to contribute phosphorus to surface waters, counteracting our best practices elsewhere."

Simply put, no amount of bay cleanup efforts will have a significant impact if we do not cut off the pollution from the source.

The Chesapeake Bay watershed is home to more than 17 million people, with about 150,000 new people moving to the area each year. There are more than 100,000 streams, creeks and rivers in the watershed and every citizen in the area lives within a few miles of one of these tributaries. Therefore, no one will be unaffected by the pollution of the bay.

Environmentally, the bay supports more than 2,700 species of plants and animals, including 348 species of fin fish and 173 species of shellfish, and it produces about 500 million pounds of seafood per year.

A Chesapeake Bay Foundation report stated that between 1998 and 2006, crabbing¿related jobs in Maryland and Virginia declined by 40 percent, from 11,246 to 6,760. The health of not only the bay ecosystem but also Maryland's economy depends upon the cleanup of the watershed.

Maryland needs to act quickly and effectively if it is to have any hope of restoring the bay to a healthy and fully functioning ecosystem.

Maryland committed to updating the PMT in 2011, and after four years of delay, Gov. Martin O'Malley's administration has finally pledged to implement this long overdue tool by the end of 2014.

However, lobbyists for big agricultural corporations are seeking additional delays, until 2017 or later. And the legislature has bent over backward to accommodate the agricultural industry through legislation or the budget.

The PMT must be implemented as soon as possible if we are to save this precious ecosystem. There are nearly 18,000 local governments in the bay watershed, including towns, cities, counties and townships. So speak up! The Maryland legislature is currently looking at several creative ways to delay implementing the PMT, some of which attempt to put off implementation indefinitely. Let your elected officials know how important the Chesapeake Bay is to you and your community.

Tess Fields

The writer is an intern with Environment Maryland.

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • What about Pa. manure?

    What about Pa. manure?

    On an almost recurring basis lately, The Sun has devoted itself to bringing to everyone's attention the Eastern Shore poultry industry's polluted runoff flowing into the Chesapeake Bay ("Larry Hogan has a chance to be a green governor," Dec. 13). Attention should be directed to the Amish farmers...

  • Hogan can protect farms and open space

    Hogan can protect farms and open space

    Congratulations to Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan on his inauguration. Mr. Hogan ran a terrific campaign, and we all look forward to his leadership on one of the most important roles, safeguarding the lands and waters of this beautiful state.

  • Cleaning up the Bay

    Cleaning up the Bay

    I was pleased to read that the EPA finds Maryland is making progress toward our clean water goals for the Chesapeake Bay and that we're on course to reduce phosphorus pollution ("EPA finds Maryland mostly on track in Bay cleanup, but Pennsylvania lagging badly," June 12).

  • New rules needed to protect Eastern Shore waterways

    New rules needed to protect Eastern Shore waterways

    After talking about it for years, Maryland finally has proposed long-overdue regulations on phosphorous pollution from animal manure in the Chesapeake Bay ("Hogan vows to fight farm pollution rules," Dec. 8).

  • Big Ag must be held to account for bay pollution

    Big Ag must be held to account for bay pollution

    Dan Rodricks' arguments for protecting the Chesapeake Bay from pollution from chicken farms could have been even stronger ("Larry Hogan has a chance to be a green governor," Dec. 13).

  • Kamenetz is pandering on stormwater fees

    Kamenetz is pandering on stormwater fees

    Thank your for your recent article, "Reduced stormwater fees sought," (Jan. 17) and the editorial covering the same topics ("Backtracking on the bay," Jan. 22). Baltimore County Executive Kevin Kamenetz seems to be pandering to special interests and positioning himself for higher office. His ideas...

  • Md. leaders protect funds for bay cleanup

    Md. leaders protect funds for bay cleanup

    Senators Barbara Mikulski and Ben Cardin, along with Rep. Steny Hoyer, deserve our thanks for securing funding in the recent omnibus appropriations bill to keep Maryland on track to cleaning up the Chesapeake Bay and its rivers and streams ("For better or worse, spending bill passes," Dec. 15).

  • Excess phosphorous is killing the bay

    Excess phosphorous is killing the bay

    In the days following Dan Rodricks' column "Larry Hogan has a chance to be a green governor" (Dec. 13), your paper has been flooded with letters opposing the phosphorus management tool (PMT) regulations and opposing Mr. Rodricks position. On the surface it would seem that both letters in support...

Comments
Loading
73°