Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

One racing weekend is no panacea for Baltimore

The Grand Prix is in our rear view mirror, and fans from New York to Georgia seem to have had a good time. The downtown hotels and a few Inner Harbor restaurants got a two-day bump. The city's mayor declared that she gave "Baltimore the opportunity to shine" ("A jubilant finish line for the Grand Prix," Sept. 5). But before declaring victory, lets ask a few questions about the real impact of this event.

What opportunities were lost as City Hall became a headquarters for race promotion? The Grand Prix cost not only millions of dollars for roads but also required thousands of hours of city resources for planning and support. For months, city officials have been pre-occupied and have put numerous neighborhood projects on the back burner as the Grand Prix took priority.

Hundreds of police and fire personnel dedicated thousands of hours to the race — successfully protecting race visitors but ignoring our citizens. Transportation, public works, all city agencies had to pitch in to make the race a success, even though we are perpetually told that these agencies are strapped for resources to solve Baltimore's problems.

How is life better for those of us who live in the city after Labor Day? How many Baltimoreans have new, full-time jobs as result of the race? How many companies have set up shop year-round in Baltimore? How many new recreation centers or park improvements do we have? Are our schools better? Are our streets safer? Are our taxes lower or our tax collection better? Are our streets and alleys cleaner? Is the quality of life for the average Baltimorean better today than it was last Friday?

Tourist weekends, no matter how successful for the Inner Harbor, are not a reasonable development strategy for Baltimore's future. We should ask our officials to focus on fixing problems and generating strategies that will make real, long-term improvements in the everyday life of citizens. Our future is in economic policies that will make Baltimore a place where businesses want to locate and people want to live.

Throwing a party is nice, but it doesn't fix the plumbing. I suspect that today many of our Grand Prix visitors are thinking the same thing I am: Baltimore is a nice place for a party, but is there any reason to live there? Let's hope City Hall can figure out an answer to that question. If not, we can all come back to visit on race day from our new homes in the suburbs.

Mac Nachlas, Baltimore

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Baltimore's leaders veer off-course, again
    Baltimore's leaders veer off-course, again

    I guess we should be used to the ongoing incompetence and mismanagement that is Baltimore City, but it certainly is a depressing spectacle to watch our city "leaders" stumble from one screw-up to the next. I was thrilled when we finally got a first-class race event (for Americans, anyway)...

  • Grand Prix disliked? Who says?
    Grand Prix disliked? Who says?

    Detractors of the Baltimore Grand Prix (or most things) typically speak in broad terms using "no one liked" or "everyone was glad to see it go." These are typically false misnomers which apply only to their disgruntled clique of friends. I have friends who live in the immediate vicinity of...

  • Mayor won't admit truth about Grand Prix
    Mayor won't admit truth about Grand Prix

    In her recent commentary in The Sun, Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake tries obfuscation to explain her sophomoric push for the Grand Prix, instead of admitting the truth — that it has been a financial flop, was a huge waste of taxpayer funds and tied the city in knots for a month each...

  • Where IndyCar failed, might NASCAR succeed?
    Where IndyCar failed, might NASCAR succeed?

    The letter from the co-founders of Viva House was spot on ("Plenty of things to regret about the Grand Prix," Sept. 19). What it failed to do was explain how the cancellation of the Baltimore Grand Prix would make things better. Outside of making them feel better.

  • Plenty of things to regret about sponsoring the Grand Prix
    Plenty of things to regret about sponsoring the Grand Prix

    Unlike Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, we do have regrets regarding the wisdom of sponsoring the Baltimore Grand Prix and similar events ("Rawlings-Blake: No regrets on the Grand Prix," Sept. 16).

  • The Grand Prix was never a good fit for Baltimore
    The Grand Prix was never a good fit for Baltimore

    It seems that when it comes to the doomed Baltimore Grand Prix, there is really no gray area. Baltimoreans either embraced it or abhorred it. I am in the latter category ("Grand Prix of Baltimore canceled through 2015, and likely beyond," Sept. 13).

  • Grand Prix not a 'game-changer'
    Grand Prix not a 'game-changer'

    The Grand Prix of Baltimore, the race that Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake promised would be a "game-changer" has come and gone ("Grand Prix of Baltimore canceled through 2015, and likely beyond," Sept. 13). Apparently, the game changed and we missed it

  • Why did Baltimore neglect Grand Prix?
    Why did Baltimore neglect Grand Prix?

    I really do not understand the workings of the city. If Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake and her people were trying to promote the Baltimore Grand Prix, how did the dates get booked for a college football game on the same weekend for next year, and a convention the following year ("Grand Prix...

Comments
Loading