Get unlimited digital access to $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Bag tax wouldn't be so affordable [Letter]

Where does letter writer David Liddle get off saying Baltimore's proposed tax on shopping bags would not have hurt anyone ("All can afford a 10-cent bag," Jan. 27 When you go to the grocery store, there are usually 10 grocery bags at least. No one has the right to tell another person they can afford anything. Everyone's circumstances are different.

If the "bag tax" were affordable, why are there so many people out of work and living on the streets, robbing and killing to get money any way they can? The reusable bags cost money. How are these destitute people who can barely put food on the table able to afford to buy reusable bags? There is more discarded trash on the streets from people throwing away their food wrappers, not from plastic grocery bags which most people like myself use for many projects around the house and yard. If stored properly, they won't blow away.

It appears clear that Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake isn't looking to be re-elected with all of these new taxes and surcharges she is burdening city folk with.

June P. Byrne

To respond to this letter, send an email to Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Bag ban casts Baltimore as 'Chump City'
    Bag ban casts Baltimore as 'Chump City'

    Nobody asked columnist Dan Rodricks about banning plastic bags, and nobody asked Baltimore retailers or shoppers either ("Nobody asked me, but City Council needs spine," Nov. 23).

  • No more chasing away city retailers
    No more chasing away city retailers

    Since Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake has now vetoed the plastic bag ban and it's unlikely the Baltimore City Council can muster the votes to overturn her veto, this would be a good time to promote changes in Baltimore's civic behavior ("Mayor vetoes plastic bag ban, body camera bill," Dec....

  • Let's just ban the bags
    Let's just ban the bags

    I have a problem with plastic bags and the bag tax issue ("Council passes body camera bill, plastic bag ban, but veto looms," Nov. 17). So much time and energy has been spent on this issue. When we take a step back and look at the bigger picture, there are so many daily issues, each much more...

  • City bag ban would be about as effective as its gun laws
    City bag ban would be about as effective as its gun laws

    I wish the Baltimore City Council luck with its plastic bag bill ("Bag it, City Council," Nov. 11). Hope it works out better than the gun laws in effect.

  • Bravos for the bag ban
    Bravos for the bag ban

    For the first time in a long time I'm proud of Baltimore City and the City Council, not for passing a proposed 5-cent tax on plastic grocery bags but for going all the way and banning them outright ("Baltimore City Council moves to ban plastic bags," Nov. 10).

  • Let's ease up on city retailers
    Let's ease up on city retailers

    Wow! Dan Rodricks offers an argument against plastic bags based on an old John Waters movie. What a stretch ("We can learn to live without plastic bags," Nov. 13)!

  • Big retailers muscle up in bag fight
    Big retailers muscle up in bag fight

    I was disappointed to see the editorial opposing the plastic shopping bag ban ("Bag it, City Council,Please do not allow the mayor to go unscathed with her review of fees and taxes ("Rawlings-Blake seeking study of Baltimore's taxes and fees," Nov. 12).

  • Bag it, City Council
    Bag it, City Council

    It now appears that City Hall not only lacks updated phone equipment but suffers a shortage of TV sets, radios and other modern communications gear. Nothing else could explain the Baltimore City Council's handling of plastic shopping bag legislation, which on Monday night morphed from an...