Get unlimited digital access to baltimoresun.com. $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Cleaning up Baltimore's trash-strewn streets would solve a lot of problems [Letter]

This afternoon I went to my office to write letters in support of Baltimore's bag tax, and during my half-block commute, a discarded plastic bag blew across my path. I did what I usually do: Chased it down and picked it up. It was one less bag in the belly of a dead whale ("Bag tax economics," Jan. 22).

The facts are that the U.S. consumes about 100 billion plastic bags a year out of the total of 1 trillion used worldwide. That's a million plastic bags used per minute. And only 1 percent to 3 percent of them are recycled. Aside from cigarette butts, plastic bags are the second-most common type of ocean refuse and a huge reason why there are 46,000 pieces of plastic floating in every square mile of ocean.

Most people either don't know or care that it takes 1,000 years for polyethylene bags to completely break down, and even then they don't break down into naturally occurring compounds. Instead, they break down into smaller and smaller toxic bits that contaminate soil and waterways and enter the food chain of animals first, then us. Garbage is what we end up eating.

There's plenty of research on the so-called "broken window theory," which describes how litter affects safety and property values, sullies the perception of locations and discourages investment. Yet here in Baltimore, Styrofoam bans have failed to win City Council support, and a bottle tax has been implemented while a return-deposit system has been rejected due to the city's lack of willingness to deal with the upfront costs and placement of return centers.

Deposits, bag fees and Styrofoam bans have proven positive impact, but in the 17 years I have lived here the status quo hasn't changed. And this despite Baltimore making the news a little over a year ago as the third dirtiest city in the nation behind New Orleans and New York.

Since then NYC has taken some pretty progressive action. On Tuesday, when I was at the bag tax hearing at City Hall, I got a text saying New York had just banned Styrofoam. It's also implementing composting and E-cycling. It's interesting that in less than two years a much bigger ship than ours managed to turn itself around.

But there is always some excuse here. We bicker over the sausage-making aspects of the bill — a regressive tax on the poor, too many exemptions, too few, how it will hurt retailers, how it is a people problem, not a litter problem — and so on. Yet I have seen pitifully few people engaged in the thankless tasks of trying to clean up the existing mess or trying to educate young litterers who are learning from their parents to throw their trash out the car door.

Cleaning up this city would go a long way toward encouraging investment and long-term residents, which would help grow the tax base so that those who live here wouldn't feel as if they were being bled dry. No single solution is going to do it. This needs attacking from many angles. Including taxes, bans and deposits.

Bridget Parlato, Baltimore

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Bag ban casts Baltimore as 'Chump City'
    Bag ban casts Baltimore as 'Chump City'

    Nobody asked columnist Dan Rodricks about banning plastic bags, and nobody asked Baltimore retailers or shoppers either ("Nobody asked me, but City Council needs spine," Nov. 23).

  • No more chasing away city retailers
    No more chasing away city retailers

    Since Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake has now vetoed the plastic bag ban and it's unlikely the Baltimore City Council can muster the votes to overturn her veto, this would be a good time to promote changes in Baltimore's civic behavior ("Mayor vetoes plastic bag ban, body camera bill," Dec....

  • Let's just ban the bags
    Let's just ban the bags

    I have a problem with plastic bags and the bag tax issue ("Council passes body camera bill, plastic bag ban, but veto looms," Nov. 17). So much time and energy has been spent on this issue. When we take a step back and look at the bigger picture, there are so many daily issues, each much more...

  • City bag ban would be about as effective as its gun laws
    City bag ban would be about as effective as its gun laws

    I wish the Baltimore City Council luck with its plastic bag bill ("Bag it, City Council," Nov. 11). Hope it works out better than the gun laws in effect.

  • Bravos for the bag ban
    Bravos for the bag ban

    For the first time in a long time I'm proud of Baltimore City and the City Council, not for passing a proposed 5-cent tax on plastic grocery bags but for going all the way and banning them outright ("Baltimore City Council moves to ban plastic bags," Nov. 10).

  • Let's ease up on city retailers
    Let's ease up on city retailers

    Wow! Dan Rodricks offers an argument against plastic bags based on an old John Waters movie. What a stretch ("We can learn to live without plastic bags," Nov. 13)!

  • Big retailers muscle up in bag fight
    Big retailers muscle up in bag fight

    I was disappointed to see the editorial opposing the plastic shopping bag ban ("Bag it, City Council,Please do not allow the mayor to go unscathed with her review of fees and taxes ("Rawlings-Blake seeking study of Baltimore's taxes and fees," Nov. 12).

  • Bag it, City Council
    Bag it, City Council

    It now appears that City Hall not only lacks updated phone equipment but suffers a shortage of TV sets, radios and other modern communications gear. Nothing else could explain the Baltimore City Council's handling of plastic shopping bag legislation, which on Monday night morphed from an...

Comments
Loading