Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Cutting through the fog surrounding city dock

I've been following with great interest the rezoning of the Fawcett building site at the city dock and the corollary issues addressed in the City Dock Master Plan ("Coalition forms to fight rezoning for Annapolis City Dock area," June 25). When I heard that the Save Annapolis Coalition was holding a press conference on the issue, I pulled up the ordinance and reread it so I could attend their event and fully understand their position.

At the press conference, I heard some very concerning points raised by many of the coalition's speakers, but they differed so widely from my understanding of the ordinance that I reread it again. In the spirit of fostering an informed debate, I decided to list some of the issues they raised and compare them with the language in the ordinance itself.

A little background first. The ordinance changes the zoning of the Fawcett building and the two parking lots on either side of it from Waterfront Maritime Conservation Zoning to one of two sub categories: Waterfront City Dock — Mixed Use (WCD-MX) and Waterfront City Dock — Open Space (WCD-OS). The building itself will be WCD-MX, and the two parking lots will be WCD-OS.

Claim: The ordinance will eliminate parking spots.

Truth: It specifically allows for parking in the Open Space area, and nothing in language mandates that that change.

Claim: The building will be 45 feet tall.

Truth: The current maximum height is 32 feet. This will change to 38 feet, the same height as the historic buildings on the other side of the dock.

Claim: This will open the door to rezoning of all the maritime zones in the city, including Eastport.

Truth: Nothing in the ordinance mandates or even suggests a review of the city's other maritime zones. It is specific to the Fawcett site.

Claim: The Annapolis boat shows will lose exhibitor space.

Truth: The shows have historically utilized the two parking lots, and the rezoning allows for them to continue utilizing them.

The ordinance does create a new kind of development called a Waterfront Planned Development that would be allowed in the WCD-OS and WCD-MX zones, but any such development would have to go through a separate public review process. It is that subsequent review that will ultimately determine that scale of any new development. The ordinance simply allows the site to be utilized for something other than maritime-related businesses.

The City Dock Master Plan has many good parts and some questionable parts, and it is important that we come together as a city and have an educated debate about these issues as they move forward. Utilizing scare tactics and deliberately spreading misinformation doesn't help that process. I would encourage every city resident to read the language in the ordinance. It is available on the city's website.

Tom McCarthy, Annapolis

The writer is a candidate for alderman in Ward 1.

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Coalition forms to fight Annapolis dock rezoning
    Coalition forms to fight Annapolis dock rezoning

    A coalition of groups concerned with redevelopment of downtown Annapolis is forming to fight a City Dock rezoning plan being promoted by Annapolis Mayor Josh Cohen.

  • Coalition to Save Annapolis launches zoning fight
    Coalition to Save Annapolis launches zoning fight

    Several dozen people gathered Tuesday in Annapolis to announce their intention to block parts of a City Dock master plan and a bill from Annapolis Mayor Josh Cohen that could spark redevelopment of a vacant building.

  • At root of much youth violence is hunger
    At root of much youth violence is hunger

    Your article, "City's violence can take hidden toll" (Dec. 14), was important in that it outlined the issues of crime in neighborhoods and help that is being undertaken to curb the violence from the children of this city. It is important, but it doesn't address the cause for some of the...

  • Dealing with childhood violence
    Dealing with childhood violence

    Thank you for Andrea McDaniels' brilliant article on the impact of violence on children ("Advocates aim to save Baltimore children from impact of violence," Dec. 14). Pediatricians are so concerned about this issue — called Adverse Childhood Experiences — that we have made the...

  • Reduce littering? Yes. Death wish? No
    Reduce littering? Yes. Death wish? No

    I write in response to Charlotte Eliopoulos' criticism of Dan Rodricks and the other "older guys" on the bus who did not confront the young guy who threw a McDonald's bag into the street ("Littering comes down to a question of attitude," Dec. 14). Someone needs to remind her that it is not...

  • Big Ag must be held to account for bay pollution
    Big Ag must be held to account for bay pollution

    Dan Rodricks' arguments for protecting the Chesapeake Bay from pollution from chicken farms could have been even stronger ("Larry Hogan has a chance to be a green governor," Dec. 13).

Comments
Loading