Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

City Dock plan is wrong for Annapolis

The City Dock Master Plan for Annapolis may have been on the planning table for two years, but that doesn't mean it is supported by the citizens of Annapolis ("City dock plans restores the luster of Annapolis' crown jewel," July 18).

Since when must we question the integrity of respected organizations like Historic Annapolis Inc., the Ward One Residents Association, the U.S. Yacht Shows and others who are contributors to the well-being of the community of Annapolis?

Private citizens from all sectors are speaking out against a potential public disaster. They are asking for a comprehensive study on flooding, parking, traffic and economic impact before they are willing to approve anything. They are interested in holding dialogue, and they have not been heard.

The City Dock is a great open space that presently is protected by Waterfront Maritime Conservation zoning instituted in 1987. Because of this zoning, Annapolitans and visitors alike still enjoy complete access to their historic and maritime heritage.

If the Master Plan were approved, one fears a domino effect of building on the shorelines of our idyllic state capital. The proposed new zoning would divide the current open space of the dock into "open space" and "mixed use" areas.

"Mixed use" waterfront zoning would permit the introduction of restaurants, liquor stores, condos and offices right in the middle of a space that is presently used as a friendly "town square."

There is definitely room for compromise, even on new construction, but the "compromise" offered for Compromise Street was a structure which exceeded the city building height code.

Outside interests are standing in the way of progress. The question is: Will the community get its way or will the developers? Let the dialogue begin.

Claudia Lane, Baltimore

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Downtown Annapolis' charm is at risk

    A dispute over zoning at the Annapolis City Dock may lead to unintended consequences detrimental to the long-term vitality of our community. In her column on July 12 ("Annapolis whiffs on City Dock again"), Susan Reimer called the Save Annapolis Coalition members some "fusty historic types," and...

  • Mayor says City Dock plans restores luster of Annapolis' crown jewel [Letter]

    Mayor says City Dock plans restores luster of Annapolis' crown jewel [Letter]

    The "No" Club is hindering changes that Annapolis needs

  • Ellen Moyer: Mayor is selling out Annapolis to curry favor with developers

    Ellen Moyer: Mayor is selling out Annapolis to curry favor with developers

    I am disappointed that Mayor Josh Cohen has chosen the ploy of character assassination to obscure his own obtuse actions in promoting a zoning change to curry favor with a developer ("City Dock plans restore the luster of Annapolis' crown jewel," July 19).

  • Baltimore needs BRT

    Baltimore needs BRT

    Recently, Lt. Gov. Boyd Rutherford announced that Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) should be considered as an alternative instead of the now-shelved Red Line light rail system ("Who knew Hogan, Rutherford were such transit geeks," July 15). Why? Costs. Light rail is extremely expensive — to the tune of...

  • Iran deal — war now or war later

    Iran deal — war now or war later

    In its recent editorial, The Sun adopts President Barack Obama's primary argument in favor of the Iran deal — that the only choice is the deal or war ("A 'good enough' agreement," July 24). No one wants war. But the choice here is not war or no war. It is war now or war later.

  • The evil of Iran

    The evil of Iran

    We sat 5,000-plus strong in the Walter E. Washington Convention Center in the District of Columbia for three intense days of Christians United For Israel (CUFI) 10th summit on July 12-14. We came from all across the nation (including 95 members from other countries and 500 college students). We...