Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Screening for Alzheimer's carries its own risks [Letter]

I write in response to Susan Peschin's recent commentary on Alzheimer's disease ("Alzheimer's again gets the short shrift," April 14).

Ms. Peschin contends that we are not doing enough to screen for Alzheimer's Disease, and she faults the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, an independent panel charged with developing guidelines for primary care clinicians, for not recommending widespread dementia testing.

As a geriatric physician who has been caring for dementia patients for more than 20 years, I have found several problems with screening.

First, it is not always accurate and can lead to labeling someone with Alzheimer's Disease when they do not in fact have progressive dementia — a diagnosis that can have significant emotional and financial repercussions for patients.

Dementia is a variable disease, Some of my patients progress rapidly in a matter of months, while others are fairly stable after a decade. Labeling them does not impact that reality.

Second, broad testing with scans and labs, visits to neurologists and even trips to specialized dementia centers do not alter the disease's progression.

Only about six in every 1,000 cases of dementia are fully reversible, and most of those are discovered by simple tests performed by a primary care doctor.

Third, there is no treatment for Alzheimer's. The available drugs do not alter the disease's course; they mask symptoms only marginally better than a placebo and only for a brief period of time. They also have side effects.

So once we make a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, then what? In my experience, the onset of dementia is something that can be ascertained by a doctor-patient-family consensus without sophisticated screening and without labeling. After that, strategies to confront and cope with the disease can be derived.

Before Medicare or insurers begin to pay for screening they should start helping families and patients cope with the disease by deferring the cost of day care, home care, exercise programs and support groups.

These are the most crucial ingredients needed to enable people to contend with a very frightening and little-understood disease. Simply putting a label on it, however, accomplishes nothing.

Andy Lazris, Columbia

To respond to this letter, send an email to Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Alzheimer's testing is essential [Letter]

    In his letter to the editor in response to Alliance for Aging Research's CEO Sue Peschin's commentary, "Alzheimer's again gets the short shrift" (April 14), Dr. Andy Lazris of Columbia contends that since there are no effective treatments for Alzheimer's disease there should be no testing ("Screening...

  • Detecting Alzheimer's early [Letter]

    I am responding to the letter from Dr. Andy Lazris entitled "Screening for Alzheimer's carries its own risks," (April 17).

  • More research is needed on Alzheimer's screening [Letter]

    Commentator Susan Peschin cites a recent statement by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force that highlights the insufficient evidence around screening for cognitive impairment in older adults, characterizing it as "masking" obstacles to detecting Alzheimer's disease ("Alzheimer's again gets the...

  • Alzheimer's again gets the short shrift [Commentary]

    Alzheimer's again gets the short shrift [Commentary]

    The country's most feared disease is poorly funded in terms of research

  • There's good science behind Alzheimer's screening recommendation [Letter]

    In her commentary, Susan Peschin criticizes the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force for not finding evidence of benefit for screening for dementia as based on sound science ("Alzheimer's again gets short shrift," April 14). On what else should such a profound public health policy be made? It is...

  • Mfume: Sun is too quick to judge Mosby

    Mfume: Sun is too quick to judge Mosby

    Last November Baltimore elected the youngest prosecutor of any major American city, and Marilyn Mosby has brought a balanced approach and a steady hand to the work of restoring a sense of justice and civility to the city's criminal justice system.

  • Why not just give Iran the bomb?

    Why not just give Iran the bomb?

    I have a great idea for an update to the Iran deal that would save a lot of time. We should go ahead and provide Iran with nuclear weapons and also some ICBMs. This will substantially shorten the time necessary for them to develop or purchase them on their own.

  • No more riots, please

    No more riots, please

    Wow. City "leaders" getting ready for protests (also known as riots), thanks for the "heads up" ("City readies for protests," Aug. 27). It's time the law-abiding, taxpaying citizens of Baltimore say loud and clear: "Enough!"