Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Obama and Afghanistan: Shades of appeasement

Since the conception and birth of our nation, the basic challenge for our existence has been our participation in our wars of survival which have required our citizens to gallantly rise up and take arms and go into battle. Such action by our nation began with the Revolutionary War (1775-83) when our American colonies gained their independence from Great Britain.

This tremendous victory has been followed down through the years by early skirmishes with the native Indians, Spain, France, and Mexico, and then later by the two World Wars, Vietnam, the Korean Conflict and the powerful9/11attack.

After 9/11 it was determined that the planning and execution of the attack originated in Afghanistan byal-Qaida with the acquiescence of the Taliban, who have openly declared numerous times that their main objective in life was to annihilate every freedom loving individual from the face of the earth.

For many years the U.S. and NATO military forces have been at war with our enemies in Afghanistan and occasionally Pakistan, where sincere support for our cause has been lacking even though they are receiving billions of dollars of financial aid annually from the U.S. Even though the U.S is unhappy with Pakistan's lackadaisical attitude toward the prevailing problem, it appears to be completely ignored there by some prominent individuals who have openly spoken out and taken action in support of the terrorists but as yet haven't been brought to court.

It is quite obvious to me that our enemies in this area cannot be adequately controlled by the Afghanistan government and their military forces alone and are desperately in need of considerable more U.S. and NATO military assistance to prevent these rebels from planning and executing another attack on the U.S., which would make the explosions of 9/11 resemble a popping firecracker.

Mr. President, the survival of the U.S. seems to me to be far more important than your dates of appeasement, which appear to be in the interest of your reelection in November of 2012.

Quinton. D. Thompson, Towson

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • The last POW [Editorial]

    The last POW [Editorial]

    Our view: Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl's return is welcome, but the lack of transparency with which the Obama administration accomplished it is not

  • U.S. should offer sanctuary to Afghanis [Letter]

    One of the most horrific episodes of the Vietnam war was the plight of those South Vietnamese who were loyal to the United States throughout the war. Known as the "boat people," they desperately, and often fatally, tried to escape Communist retaliation after the fall of Saigon.

  • Our insufferable ally in Kabul [Editorial]

    Our insufferable ally in Kabul [Editorial]

    Our view: Despite President Hamid Karzai's erratic behavior, the U.S. has long-term interests in Afghanistan that must be protected

  • Nation's illegal drone war must end [Letter]

    Nation's illegal drone war must end [Letter]

    I could not help note that while reading "NSA tracks location of phones, documents show" (Dec. 5), there was a nearby ad for a cell phone and other electronic devices. Readers should also know that the National Security Agency provides "intelligence" in coordinating killer drone strikes.

  • Bring our troops home now [Letter]

    Bring our troops home now [Letter]

    The only issue that President Obama and I agree on is getting our troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan. As a Vietnam veteran, I personally witnessed the killing fields of American soldiers when that corrupt government and its citizens did not want us in their country.

  • Let the Afghans fend for themselves [Letter]

    Let the Afghans fend for themselves [Letter]

    According to The Sun, Afghan President Hamid Karzai is balking at signing a security treaty with us ("Afghans baffled by Karzai's refusal to sign deal with U.S." Nov. 26).